All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
To: Ian Campbell <icampbell@arcom.com>
Cc: nico@cam.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: "deadlock" between smc91x driver and link_watch
Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2004 15:31:58 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20041123153158.6f20a7d7.akpm@osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1101230194.14370.12.camel@icampbell-debian>

Ian Campbell <icampbell@arcom.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
> 
> I'm seeing a deadlock in linkwatch_event() when bringing down an
> Ethernet interface using the smc91x driver (drivers/net/smc91x.c).
> 
> What I am seeing is that smc_close() is calling netif_carrier_off which
> has the call chain:
> 	netif_carrier_off
> 	-> linkwatch_fire_event
> 	   -> schedule_work or schedule_delayed_work
> The function that is scheduled is linkwatch_event().
> 
> smc_close() then goes on to call flush_scheduled_work() in order to
> ensure that it's own pending workqueue stuff (smc_phy_configure()) is
> completed before powering down the PHY.
> 
> What I am seeing is that linkwatch_event() is deadlocking trying take
> rtnl_sem via rtnl_shlock(). The lock appears to already be held by a
> call to rtnl_lock() from devinet_ioctl().
> 
> Any ideas? Perhaps smc_phy_configure calls could just check that the
> interface is up before continuing, then there would be no need to flush
> the queue to get rid of it.
> 

linkwatch probably doesn't need the flush_scheduled_work(), because it
correctly does refcounting on the device.  Presumably that
flush_scheduled_work() in smc_close() is there to force out any pending
calls to smc_phy_configure().

One possible fix would be to remove that flush_scheduled_work() and to do
refcounting around smc_phy_configure(): dev_hold() when scheduling the work
(if schedule_work() returned true), dev_put() in the handler.


  reply	other threads:[~2004-11-23 23:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-11-23 17:16 "deadlock" between smc91x driver and link_watch Ian Campbell
2004-11-23 23:31 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2004-11-24  9:41   ` Ian Campbell
2004-11-24  9:46     ` Andrew Morton
2004-11-24  9:58       ` Ian Campbell
2004-11-24 15:21         ` Nicolas Pitre
2004-11-24 15:52           ` Ian Campbell
2004-11-24 16:57             ` Nicolas Pitre
2004-11-24 17:13               ` Ian Campbell
2004-11-25  9:59               ` Ian Campbell
2004-11-25 16:31                 ` Nicolas Pitre

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20041123153158.6f20a7d7.akpm@osdl.org \
    --to=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=icampbell@arcom.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
    --cc=nico@cam.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.