From: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
To: Gerd Knorr <kraxel@bytesex.org>
Cc: pawfen@wp.pl, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: MTRR vesafb and wrong X performance
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2004 10:40:07 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20041129154006.GB3898@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87is7ogb93.fsf@bytesex.org>
On Mon, Nov 29, 2004 at 12:12:08PM +0100, Gerd Knorr wrote:
> > > Please send the full dmesg output and the contents of /proc/mtrr for
> > > 2.6.10-rc2.
> > reg02: base=0xe3000000 (3632MB), size= 4MB: write-combining, count=1
> > vesafb: framebuffer at 0xe3000000, mapped to 0xcc880000, using 1875k,
> > total 4096k
>
> The BIOS reports 4MB video memory, and vesafb adds an mtrr entry for
> that. Looks ok, with the exception that the reported 4MB are probably
> not correct, otherwise the X-Server wouldn't complain.
vesafb is assuming that the memory used in the current screen mode
xres*yres*depth rounded up to nearest power of 2, is the amount of
ram the card has, which is not just wrong, it's dumb.
> vesafb in 2.6.10-rc2 has a option to overwrite the BIOS-reported value
> (vtotal=n, with n in megabytes), that should fix it.
which is an ugly hack for the above problem imo.
vesafb:nomtrr also fixes the problem, and leaves X free
to set things up correctly in my experience.
If vesafb can't get it right, maybe it shouldn't be
attempted to do it in the half-assed way it currently does.
Dave
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-11-29 15:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-11-24 23:15 MTRR vesafb and wrong X performance Pawel Fengler
2004-11-25 1:18 ` Andrew Morton
2004-11-25 21:56 ` Pawel Fengler
2004-11-29 11:12 ` Gerd Knorr
2004-11-29 15:40 ` Dave Jones [this message]
2004-11-29 16:22 ` Gerd Knorr
2004-11-29 16:57 ` Dave Jones
2004-11-29 17:34 ` Gerd Knorr
2004-11-29 17:22 ` Alan Cox
2004-11-29 18:17 ` Dave Jones
2004-11-29 17:23 ` Alan Cox
2004-11-29 16:24 ` Alan Cox
2004-11-25 8:49 ` Gerd Knorr
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-11-26 16:48 Pawel Fengler
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20041129154006.GB3898@redhat.com \
--to=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=kraxel@bytesex.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pawfen@wp.pl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.