From: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
To: blaisorblade_spam@yahoo.it
Cc: jdike@addtoit.com, bstroesser@fujitsu-siemens.com,
user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [uml-devel] Re: [patch 1/2] Uml - first part rework of run_helper() and users.
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2004 15:20:17 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20041130152017.129e134c.akpm@osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20041130200845.2C5058BAFE@zion.localdomain>
blaisorblade_spam@yahoo.it wrote:
>
> Fixed a file descriptor leak in the network driver when changing an IP
> address.
>
> Fixed the error handling in run_helper.
>
>
> Paolo notes:
>
> Actually, this is part one of the change, the exact one extracted from Jeff
> Dike's incrementals tree before 2.6.9-rc big UML merge.
>
> There is some changes must be done, so I'm also sending a second patch with
> this one, too. Separated for tracking purposes.
>
> Don't send this pair of ones to Linus before Jeff ACK's it - just put into -mm for now.
That makes five UML patches which I have queued up pending confirmation:
hostfs-uml-set-sendfile-to-generic_file_sendfile.patch
hostfs-uml-add-some-other-pagecache-methods.patch
uml-terminal-cleanup.patch
uml-first-part-rework-of-run_helper-and-users.patch
uml-finish-fixing-run_helper-failure-path.patch
Could you gents please put heads together and tell me whether and when
these should go upstream?
Thanks.
-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-11-30 23:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-11-30 20:08 [uml-devel] [patch 1/2] Uml - first part rework of run_helper() and users blaisorblade_spam
2004-11-30 23:20 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2004-12-01 0:20 ` [uml-devel] VFS interactions with UML and other big UML changes (was: Re: [patch 1/2] Uml - first part rework of run_helper() and users.) Blaisorblade
2004-12-01 0:20 ` Blaisorblade
2004-12-01 0:33 ` [uml-devel] " Andrew Morton
2004-12-01 0:33 ` Andrew Morton
2004-12-01 0:51 ` [uml-devel] " Blaisorblade
2004-12-01 0:51 ` Blaisorblade
2004-12-01 9:02 ` Gerd Knorr
2004-12-01 9:02 ` Gerd Knorr
2004-12-02 1:41 ` [uml-devel] Re: [patch 1/2] Uml - first part rework of run_helper() and users Jeff Dike
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20041130152017.129e134c.akpm@osdl.org \
--to=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=blaisorblade_spam@yahoo.it \
--cc=bstroesser@fujitsu-siemens.com \
--cc=jdike@addtoit.com \
--cc=user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.