From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from paperstreet.colino.net (colino.net [213.41.131.56]) (using TLSv1 with cipher EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA (168/168 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 545B42BDEB for ; Wed, 1 Dec 2004 20:12:13 +1100 (EST) Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2004 10:11:30 +0100 From: Colin Leroy To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Message-ID: <20041201101130.05f71600@pirandello> In-Reply-To: <1101891934.5592.0.camel@gaston> References: <1101877409.5672.2.camel@gaston> <20041201083617.5b72a115@pirandello> <1101891934.5592.0.camel@gaston> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Cc: linuxppc-dev list Subject: Re: TEST: Sleep patch #6 List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On 01 Dec 2004 at 20h12, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: Hi, > > Compiling that. btw, you didn't add the "&& !wol" before sungem's suspend call... > > What do you mean ? the whole code block is now in !wol... I'm just being stupid, i didn't see that :) So much for trying to read patches before having had my coffee... > Note that I'm still having problems with the cache ... I'm asking > Moto/Freescale... With which CPUs? I did notice zero problems with patch #5 (without freq scaling). -- Colin