All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: ads nat <adsnat@yahoo.com>
To: Alexis <alexis@tpys.com.ar>, 'Steve Comfort' <steve@4Dllc.com>,
	netfilter@lists.netfilter.org
Subject: RE: Is this at all possible
Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2004 06:52:32 -0800 (PST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20041202145232.19949.qmail@web60401.mail.yahoo.com> (raw)

I am facing similar problem.

I have two Gateways getting Internet bandwidth from
two different sources.

Server no. 1 will disctribute bandwidth by natting to
IP address 192.168.0.2-192.168.0.150 of subnet.
eth0 - xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx
eth1 192.168.0.1

GATEWAY setting for subnet client's will be
192.168.0.1

Server No. 2 will supply bandwidth to same subnet but
it will be with squid proxy server authentication and
DHCL running. In DHCP configuration I will configure
IP's 192.168.0.151-192.168.0.200 
eth0 - xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx
eth1 - 192.168.0.254

GATEWAY setting for these IP client's will
192.168.0.254

I think It should be possible. I don't have
infrastructure to check this in the lab therefore
question.

Thanks for support.


--- Alexis <alexis@tpys.com.ar> wrote:

> Double nat is the solution for this issue.
> 
>
http://www.netfilter.org/documentation/HOWTO//netfilter-double-nat-HOWTO.htm
> l
> 
>  
> 
> > -----Mensaje original-----
> > De: netfilter-bounces@lists.netfilter.org 
> > [mailto:netfilter-bounces@lists.netfilter.org] En
> nombre de 
> > Steve Comfort
> > Enviado el: Jueves, 02 de Diciembre de 2004 9:06
> > Para: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org
> > Asunto: Is this at all possible
> > 
> > Hi all,
> > 
> > I'm 99% sure that the answer to this one is no,
> but a 
> > customer asked :)
> > 
> > They have two buildings with networks running on
> the same 
> > (192.168.2.x) subnet.
> > 
> > Is it possible to configure a (wireless) router
> that would be 
> > capable of routing between these identical
> sub-nets. Somehow, 
> > maybe restricting one half to addresses below 127
> and getting 
> > cunning with the netmask?
> > 
> > Don't ask why they don't want to change to
> different subnets!
> > 
> > A resounding lack of response will be sufficient
> confirmation 
> > for me that this is a silly scenario.
> > 
> > Ciao
> > Steve Comfort
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
> 



		
__________________________________ 
Do you Yahoo!? 
Take Yahoo! Mail with you! Get it on your mobile phone. 
http://mobile.yahoo.com/maildemo 


             reply	other threads:[~2004-12-02 14:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-12-02 14:52 ads nat [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-12-02 18:11 Is this at all possible Daniel Chemko
2004-12-02 12:05 Steve Comfort
2004-12-02 13:06 ` Alexis

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20041202145232.19949.qmail@web60401.mail.yahoo.com \
    --to=adsnat@yahoo.com \
    --cc=alexis@tpys.com.ar \
    --cc=netfilter@lists.netfilter.org \
    --cc=steve@4Dllc.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.