Re: [linux-pm] swsusp-bigdiff: power-managment changes that are waiting in my tree

[Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>]

Hi!

> > +#These are not really events sent:
> > +#
> > +#System fully on -- device is working normally; this is probably never
> > +#passed to suspend() method... event = ON, flags = 0
> > +#
> > +#Ready after resume -- userland is now running, again. Time to free any
> > +#memory you ate during prepare to suspend... event = ON, flags =
> > +#READY_AFTER_RESUME
> 
> I think we need to add the pm_message_t to resume. You are already
> "fixing" everybody to change u32 -> pm_message_t, so it  shouldn't be
> that bad to add this too.

We need to add pm_message_t to resume, I agree about that, but yes, it
would be quite bad if I added this, too.

All changes I'm doing are "break nothing", because pm_message_t is
typedefed to u32 for now. Therefore they can be safely merged in any
order etc...

For the documentation changes... I already rewrote that twice. I'm not
native english speaker and I need some sleep now. If you send me
nicely-looking diff, I'm likely to accept it :-).
								Pavel
-- 
People were complaining that M$ turns users into beta-testers...
...jr ghea gurz vagb qrirybcref, naq gurl frrz gb yvxr vg gung jnl!