From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261897AbULGSuP (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Dec 2004 13:50:15 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261894AbULGSuO (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Dec 2004 13:50:14 -0500 Received: from adsl-63-197-226-105.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net ([63.197.226.105]:38317 "EHLO cheetah.davemloft.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261895AbULGSuI (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Dec 2004 13:50:08 -0500 Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2004 10:48:15 -0800 From: "David S. Miller" To: Stephen Hemminger Cc: yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org, mitch@sfgoth.com, kernel@linuxace.com, linux-net@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@oss.sgi.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix select() for SOCK_RAW sockets (ipv6) Message-Id: <20041207104815.3f7a4684.davem@davemloft.net> In-Reply-To: <20041207100140.781f4c00@dxpl.pdx.osdl.net> References: <20041207045302.GA23746@linuxace.com> <20041207054840.GD61527@gaz.sfgoth.com> <20041207150834.GA75700@gaz.sfgoth.com> <20041208.023530.26430801.yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> <20041207100140.781f4c00@dxpl.pdx.osdl.net> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 1.0.0beta3 (GTK+ 1.2.10; sparc-unknown-linux-gnu) X-Face: "_;p5u5aPsO,_Vsx"^v-pEq09'CU4&Dc1$fQExov$62l60cgCc%FnIwD=.UF^a>?5'9Kn[;433QFVV9M..2eN.@4ZWPGbdi<=?[:T>y?SD(R*-3It"Vj:)"dP Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 7 Dec 2004 10:01:40 -0800 Stephen Hemminger wrote: > > Probably, we need to do the same for ipv6, don't we? > > diff -Nru a/net/ipv6/af_inet6.c b/net/ipv6/af_inet6.c > --- a/net/ipv6/af_inet6.c 2004-12-07 10:02:50 -08:00 > +++ b/net/ipv6/af_inet6.c 2004-12-07 10:02:50 -08:00 > @@ -513,6 +513,27 @@ We didn't do the "UDP select() fix" on ipv6 because we don't have the delayed checksumming optimization there. So the ipv6 side really doesn't need this change. Or did I miss something?