From: Kevin Corry <kevcorry@us.ibm.com>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>
Cc: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>,
dm-devel@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6: drivers/md/dm-io.c partially copies bio.c
Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2004 07:51:44 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200412080751.44618.kevcorry@us.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20041206144218.GA10498@suse.de>
On Monday 06 December 2004 8:42 am, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 06 2004, Kevin Corry wrote:
> > If I recall correctly (and it's been a while since I've looked at that
> > code), the bio_set was added because a few DM modules like to initiate
> > their own I/O requests (things like snapshots and DM's kcopyd daemon),
> > and we felt it was better to allow these modules to each create their
> > own mempools to allocate bios from, rather than allocate from the
> > single kernel-wide bio pool used by the filesystem layer.
>
> That is fully correct and also something that eg the bouncing code needs
> to be 100% deadlock free.
>
> > Strictly speaking (and as you mentioned), the slabs in the bio_set are
> > unnecessary, and they could use the global bio_slab. But there's
> > probably some argument to be made for having separate bio mempools for
> > these modules.
>
> The mempools are needed, the duplicated slabs are not. But that's just a
> small part of it, basically the whole allocation and index stuff is 100%
> duplicated from bio.c. Even bio_init().
>
> > Actually, I also seem to recall discussions with Joe Thornber from
> > quite awhile ago about trying to move this bio_set functionality into
> > fs/bio.c, to allow other device drivers to create their own private
> > bio pools. If you think something like this would be desireable, I can
> > try to look into the specifics again. If you think that having the
> > single kernel-wide bio pool is sufficient for all filesystems and
> > device-drivers (you certainly understand the trade-offs better than I
> > do), then I can look into removing the necessary code from dm-io.c
>
> An abstraction for this would be nice, as there are two users of it then
> (dm-io and highmem.c). So if your team would do that, I would sure help
> you review and integrate it.
>
> That's not what I'm arguing against, it's the (almost) wholesale
> duplication that's a bit silly.
I'll be happy to look into whether this duplication can be removed, and also
whether the bio_set stuff could be moved out to bio.c or somewhere else
common to the other device-drivers and filesystems. However, I've got a lot
of stuff going on right now, so I won't really have time to get to this until
after the start of the year (might be able to start looking into it over the
holidays if I get everything else done in the next couple weeks). If/When I
come up with some patches, I'll let you know.
--
Kevin Corry
kevcorry@us.ibm.com
http://evms.sourceforge.net/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-12-08 13:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-12-06 12:09 2.6: drivers/md/dm-io.c partially copies bio.c Adrian Bunk
2004-12-06 13:48 ` Kevin Corry
2004-12-06 13:55 ` Jens Axboe
2004-12-06 14:22 ` Kevin Corry
2004-12-06 14:42 ` Jens Axboe
2004-12-08 13:51 ` Kevin Corry [this message]
2004-12-08 14:31 ` [dm-devel] " Alasdair G Kergon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200412080751.44618.kevcorry@us.ibm.com \
--to=kevcorry@us.ibm.com \
--cc=axboe@suse.de \
--cc=bunk@stusta.de \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.