From: Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>
To: Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] Time sliced CFQ #4
Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2004 14:28:26 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20041208132826.GT19522@suse.de> (raw)
Hi,
The stupid sort bug warrants another release, as it basically killed
(well cut by 30%) sequential write performance. This one gets close to
'AS' tiobench sequential write performance (still 5% off), equalling it
in others. Changes:
- Various little bug fixes
- RCU the per-process-per-disk cfq io context. It probably wants a
better structure later for the many-disk setup, but at least it runs
lockless now.
- Kill the PF_SYNCWRITE stuff. Belongs to another patch, if at all.
- Fix a silly problem that caused very bad sort of dispatch list.
Might perhaps need a little re-tuning of the slice_async* values after
the sort fix.
BK patch:
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/axboe/patches/v2.6/2.6.10-rc3/cfq-time-slices-9.gz
-mm patch:
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/axboe/patches/v2.6/2.6.10-rc2-mm4/cfq-time-slices-9-mm.gz
Quick benches (reads and reads/writes mixed, 64kb block size for all)
CFQ:
buffered IO:
thread1 (read): err=0, max=398msec, min=0msec, run=30144msec, bw=6091KiB/sec
thread2 (read): err=0, max=362msec, min=0msec, run=29895msec, bw=7444KiB/sec
thread3 (write): err=0, max=4535msec, min=0msec, run=28531msec, bw=5735KiB/sec
thread4 (write): err=0, max=7926msec, min=0msec, run=28816msec, bw=5922KiB/sec
Run status:
READ: io=396672MiB, maxt=30144msec, mint=29895msec, maxb=7444, minb=6091, aggrb=13475
WRITE: io=326464MiB, maxt=28816msec, mint=28531msec, maxb=5922, minb=5735, aggrb=11601
thread1 (read): err=0, max=332msec, min=0msec, run=30030msec, bw=6739KiB/sec
thread2 (read): err=0, max=326msec, min=0msec, run=30049msec, bw=6830KiB/sec
thread3 (read): err=0, max=333msec, min=0msec, run=30065msec, bw=6779KiB/sec
thread4 (read): err=0, max=331msec, min=0msec, run=30003msec, bw=6801KiB/sec
Run status:
READ: io=796416MiB, maxt=30065msec, mint=30003msec, maxb=6830, minb=6739, aggrb=27125
direct IO:
thread1 (read): err=0, max=318msec, min=2msec, run=30023msec, bw=6614KiB/sec
thread2 (read): err=0, max=321msec, min=2msec, run=30042msec, bw=6598KiB/sec
thread3 (read): err=0, max=329msec, min=2msec, run=30003msec, bw=6557KiB/sec
thread4 (read): err=0, max=321msec, min=2msec, run=30037msec, bw=6565KiB/sec
Run status:
READ: io=772224MiB, maxt=30042msec, mint=30003msec, maxb=6614, minb=6557, aggrb=26321
AS:
buffered IO:
thread1 (read): err=0, max=285msec, min=0msec, run=30052msec, bw=10432KiB/sec
thread2 (read): err=0, max=331msec, min=0msec, run=30033msec, bw=10714KiB/sec
thread3 (write): err=0, max=2815msec, min=0msec, run=29732msec, bw=3857KiB/sec
thread4 (write): err=0, max=2463msec, min=0msec, run=29739msec, bw=3768KiB/sec
Run status:
READ: io=620416MiB, maxt=30052msec, mint=30033msec, maxb=10714, minb=10432, aggrb=21140
WRITE: io=221440MiB, maxt=29739msec, mint=29732msec, maxb=3857, minb=3768, aggrb=7624
thread1 (read): err=0, max=644msec, min=0msec, run=30051msec, bw=7563KiB/sec
thread2 (read): err=0, max=735msec, min=0msec, run=30034msec, bw=6794KiB/sec
thread3 (read): err=0, max=843msec, min=0msec, run=30021msec, bw=6239KiB/sec
thread4 (read): err=0, max=862msec, min=0msec, run=30002msec, bw=6636KiB/sec
Run status:
READ: io=798592MiB, maxt=30051msec, mint=30002msec, maxb=7563, minb=6239, aggrb=27212
direct IO:
thread1 (read): err=0, max=518msec, min=2msec, run=30048msec, bw=6813KiB/sec
thread2 (read): err=0, max=867msec, min=2msec, run=30031msec, bw=7125KiB/sec
thread3 (read): err=0, max=939msec, min=2msec, run=30018msec, bw=6540KiB/sec
thread4 (read): err=0, max=1071msec, min=2msec, run=30000msec, bw=6201KiB/sec
Run status:
READ: io=782336MiB, maxt=30048msec, mint=30000msec, maxb=7125, minb=6201, aggrb=26661
--
Jens Axboe
reply other threads:[~2004-12-08 13:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20041208132826.GT19522@suse.de \
--to=axboe@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.