All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Olaf Kirch <okir@suse.de>
To: Mike Waychison <Michael.Waychison@Sun.COM>
Cc: "Lever, Charles" <Charles.Lever@netapp.com>, nfs@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xprt sharing (was Re: xprt_bindresvport)
Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2004 12:31:07 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20041209113107.GE15055@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <41B74551.5040908@sun.com>

On Wed, Dec 08, 2004 at 01:17:53PM -0500, Mike Waychison wrote:
> This has been bugging me for a while.  The fact that we are limitting
> ourselves to a single nfs mount per port.  From what I can tell, Solaris
> shares the transports between nfs mounts from the same server and saves
> themselves a lot of trouble with running out of port numbers in doing so.

Shouldn't we allow NFS mounts to use non-privileged ports? Many
environments don't really care about the "security" provided by privileged
ports, but would be more than happy if they can run with a few hundred
NFS mounts

Olaf
-- 
Olaf Kirch     | Things that make Monday morning interesting, #2:
okir@suse.de   |        "We have 8,000 NFS mount points, why do we keep
---------------+ 	 running out of privileged ports?"


-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. 
http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/
_______________________________________________
NFS maillist  -  NFS@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs

  reply	other threads:[~2004-12-09 11:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-12-08 14:33 xprt_bindresvport Lever, Charles
2004-12-08 18:17 ` [PATCH] xprt sharing (was Re: xprt_bindresvport) Mike Waychison
2004-12-09 11:31   ` Olaf Kirch [this message]
2004-12-09 13:36     ` Trond Myklebust
2004-12-09 13:44       ` Olaf Kirch
2004-12-09 16:20         ` Trond Myklebust
2004-12-09 19:34     ` Dan Stromberg
2004-12-09 21:33       ` Trond Myklebust
2004-12-09 22:29         ` Dan Stromberg
2004-12-09 11:01 ` xprt_bindresvport Olaf Kirch
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-12-08 19:08 [PATCH] xprt sharing (was Re: xprt_bindresvport) Lever, Charles
2004-12-08 21:58 ` Mike Waychison
2004-12-09 11:22 ` Olaf Kirch
2004-12-09 13:33   ` Trond Myklebust
2004-12-09 13:41     ` Olaf Kirch
2004-12-08 22:00 Lever, Charles
2004-12-09  8:54 Peter Åstrand
2004-12-09 11:14 ` Olaf Kirch
2004-12-09 14:03 Lever, Charles

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20041209113107.GE15055@suse.de \
    --to=okir@suse.de \
    --cc=Charles.Lever@netapp.com \
    --cc=Michael.Waychison@Sun.COM \
    --cc=nfs@lists.sourceforge.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.