From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Patrick Schaaf Subject: Re: [PATCH] info file for ROUTE target Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2004 20:57:07 +0100 Message-ID: <20041209195706.GA4121@oknodo.bof.de> References: <1102603380.7528.98.camel@descartes.info.ucl.ac.be> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: "netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org" Return-path: To: Cedric de Launois Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1102603380.7528.98.camel@descartes.info.ucl.ac.be> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org Errors-To: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org List-Id: netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org Hi Cedric, > This little patch is to allow the ROUTE target to be applied by pom-ng > on kernel >= 2.6.0. The patch just removes the "Requires: linux < 2.6.0" > line from the ROUTE/info file. Funny, I didn't notice anything strange applying to 2.6.10-rc1, recently, without that modification. Is runme broken somehow? Maybe I overlooked something. A propos overlooked (hi list at large :) - I made two postings on netfilter-devel recently, which were pure bugfixes for ROUTE, and nobody seemed to care. Any idea why that was so? https://lists.netfilter.org/pipermail/netfilter-devel/2004-November/017485.html https://lists.netfilter.org/pipermail/netfilter-devel/2004-November/017514.html I also made a new contribution, my --tee extension to ROUTE, which also went completely uncommented. https://lists.netfilter.org/pipermail/netfilter-devel/2004-November/017515.html and finally, unrelated to ROUTE, but equally ignored: https://lists.netfilter.org/pipermail/netfilter-devel/2004-November/017540.html I DEMAND IMMEDIATE ATTENTION TO THESE IMPORTANT MATTERS!!!111111111111!!!!! :) Patrick