From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
To: Bryce Harrington <bryce@osdl.org>
Cc: Tony Reix <Tony.Reix@bull.net>,
hch@infradead.org, nfs@lists.sourceforge.net,
storage_sig@osdl.org
Subject: Re: [Storage_sig] Re: Question on bug tracking for NFSv4 work
Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2004 17:08:52 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20041209220852.GD22994@fieldses.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0412091330180.8023-100000@osdlab.pdx.osdl.net>
On Thu, Dec 09, 2004 at 01:53:53PM -0800, Bryce Harrington wrote:
> Maybe a good compromise would be for those of us doing testing who
> want to track bugs, to do so, but continue using the mailing lists as
> the primary mechanism. That way if the bug tracking approach fizzles
> out, it doesn't affect normal processes, but if it succeeds then
> people can make heavier use of it. Does this sound like a feasible
> approach?
I think that's the only way to go. Some developers may just never look
at the bug database, so it may be necessary for other people to do
things like retest and close old bugs for them.
A bug database is certainly worth a try, though.
--b.
-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/
_______________________________________________
NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-12-09 22:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <200412091441.PAA173944@isatis.frec.bull.fr>
2004-12-09 21:53 ` [Storage_sig] Re: Question on bug tracking for NFSv4 work Bryce Harrington
2004-12-09 22:08 ` J. Bruce Fields [this message]
2004-12-09 22:24 Lever, Charles
2004-12-09 22:48 ` J. Bruce Fields
2004-12-10 1:07 ` Bryce Harrington
2004-12-10 1:42 ` J. Bruce Fields
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-12-10 14:51 Lever, Charles
2004-12-10 18:52 Lever, Charles
2004-12-14 1:14 ` Bryce Harrington
2004-12-15 19:45 Lever, Charles
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20041209220852.GD22994@fieldses.org \
--to=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=Tony.Reix@bull.net \
--cc=bryce@osdl.org \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=nfs@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=storage_sig@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.