All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Mark_H_Johnson@raytheon.com
Cc: Amit Shah <amit.shah@codito.com>,
	Karsten Wiese <annabellesgarden@yahoo.de>,
	Bill Huey <bhuey@lnxw.com>, Adam Heath <doogie@debian.org>,
	emann@mrv.com, Gunther Persoons <gunther_persoons@spymac.com>,
	"K.R. Foley" <kr@cybsft.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Florian Schmidt <mista.tapas@gmx.net>,
	Fernando Pablo Lopez-Lezcano <nando@ccrma.Stanford.EDU>,
	Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com>,
	Rui Nuno Capela <rncbc@rncbc.org>,
	Shane Shrybman <shrybman@aei.ca>,
	Esben Nielsen <simlo@phys.au.dk>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Michal Schmidt <xschmi00@stud.feec.vutbr.cz>
Subject: Re: [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.10-rc2-mm3-V0.7.32-15
Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2004 23:24:32 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20041210222432.GD7609@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <OFC6899882.DBD65C9D-ON86256F66.00796C43-86256F66.00796C5C@raytheon.com>


* Mark_H_Johnson@raytheon.com <Mark_H_Johnson@raytheon.com> wrote:

> Here is my get_ltrace.sh script (at the end).
> 
> So I read the preempt_max_latency (to see if its changed) before I
> copy the latency_trace output. I am not so sure that cat is really
> doing an "atomic" read when some of the latency traces are over 300
> Kbytes in length.

reading preempt_max_latency ought to be fine to detect changes.

yes, even a 300 KB trace should be read atomically too, even if it takes
3 seconds to save, hence all the different layers of trace buffers. The
kernel does not update the output buffer until the 'cat' has finished.
(unless a parallel 'cat' interferes - all your scripts are serialized,
right?)

> Also note that some of the files were empty :-(. I don't think I've
> seen that symptom before.

hm, an empty file occurs if the saved output trace is empty. This should
only be the case shortly after resetting preempt_max_latency. (or after
bootup, until it's set for the first time.)

> Note that the preempt_max_latency value DID match the last line of the
> trace output in the example I described. It is just the header that
> had some stale data in it.

yeah. It's weird. Ahh .. reviewing the header-generation code again i
noticed a buglet, which could cause spuriously wrong latency values on
SMP systems. Does the patch below fix this particular symptom?

	Ingo

--- linux/kernel/latency.c.orig
+++ linux/kernel/latency.c
@@ -542,7 +542,7 @@ static void update_out_trace(void)
 	 * trace buffer.
 	 */
 	tmp_out = out_tr.traces + 0;
-	*tmp_out = max_tr.traces[0]; // TODO: dont copy the traces
+	*tmp_out = max_tr.traces[max_tr.cpu]; // TODO: dont copy the traces
 	out_tr.cpu = max_tr.cpu;
 	out_entry = tmp_out->trace + 0;
 

  reply	other threads:[~2004-12-10 22:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-12-10 22:06 [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.10-rc2-mm3-V0.7.32-15 Mark_H_Johnson
2004-12-10 22:24 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-12-13 23:14 Mark_H_Johnson
2004-12-13 20:02 Mark_H_Johnson
2004-12-13 22:39 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-12-13 17:05 Mark_H_Johnson
2004-12-13 22:33 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-12-10 21:58 Mark_H_Johnson
2004-12-10 21:54 Mark_H_Johnson
2004-12-10 22:14 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-12-10 21:31 Mark_H_Johnson
2004-12-10 21:54 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-12-10 21:06 Mark_H_Johnson
2004-12-10 21:40 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-12-10 20:03 Mark_H_Johnson
2004-12-10 17:49 Mark_H_Johnson
2004-12-10 21:09 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-12-10 21:12 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-12-10 21:24 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-12-13  0:16 ` Fernando Lopez-Lezcano
2004-12-13  6:47   ` Ingo Molnar
2004-12-14  0:46     ` Fernando Lopez-Lezcano
2004-12-14  4:42       ` K.R. Foley
2004-12-14  8:47         ` Rui Nuno Capela
2004-12-14 11:35           ` Ingo Molnar
2004-12-09 21:58 [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.10-rc2-mm3-V0.7.32-6 Mark_H_Johnson
2004-12-09 22:55 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-12-10 10:53   ` [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.10-rc2-mm3-V0.7.32-15 Ingo Molnar
2004-12-10 14:59     ` Gene Heskett
2004-12-10 15:59       ` Gene Heskett
2004-12-10 19:09     ` Lee Revell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20041210222432.GD7609@elte.hu \
    --to=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=Mark_H_Johnson@raytheon.com \
    --cc=amit.shah@codito.com \
    --cc=annabellesgarden@yahoo.de \
    --cc=bhuey@lnxw.com \
    --cc=doogie@debian.org \
    --cc=emann@mrv.com \
    --cc=gunther_persoons@spymac.com \
    --cc=kr@cybsft.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mista.tapas@gmx.net \
    --cc=nando@ccrma.Stanford.EDU \
    --cc=rlrevell@joe-job.com \
    --cc=rncbc@rncbc.org \
    --cc=shrybman@aei.ca \
    --cc=simlo@phys.au.dk \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=xschmi00@stud.feec.vutbr.cz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.