From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andreas Grabner Subject: Re: 2 ISPs again Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2004 14:06:21 +0100 Message-ID: <20041211130621.GA2922@utanet.at> References: <40842.213.33.127.134.1102705404.squirrel@webmail.vnc.at> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <40842.213.33.127.134.1102705404.squirrel@webmail.vnc.at> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: netfilter-bounces@lists.netfilter.org Errors-To: netfilter-bounces@lists.netfilter.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org Hi On Fri, Dec 10, 2004 at 02:20:08PM -0500, Jason Opperisano wrote: > the trick is to make sure that replies to requests that come in from > ISP1 go back out ISP1. dchemko@ seems to be the "connmark master" > when > it comes to this stuff--have a look at: > > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=netfilter&m=108094979204392&w=2 At 23:12 i got it to work with this excelent answer. And it's work for houres now. Thanks a lot to Daniel and Jason. One more thing would be interesting for me: I have turned of rp_filter is this realy needed? I have not seen (with wine-red Eyes) any packest comming in the "wrong" interface. best regards Andreas Grabner