From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: maximilian attems Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 17:31:41 +0000 Subject: Re: [KJ] bitkeeper tree for kjt patchset? Message-Id: <20041214173141.GE2159@stro.at> MIME-Version: 1 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============81521382619628646==" List-Id: References: <1103041747.8263.16.camel@localhost.localdomain> In-Reply-To: <1103041747.8263.16.camel@localhost.localdomain> To: kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org --===============81521382619628646== Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Tue, 14 Dec 2004, Gustavo Franco wrote: > > What do you think of a bk repository for kjt? I did a search and i > didn't see anything related with this topic, am i missing something ? it's up to the maintainer to choose it's tool. i prefer free tools, afair randy too. > Actually, the kjt 'release process' is post the patchset to lkml when > kjt maintainer feels that it's ok, no? IMO, it can be done the same way > but asking for Andrew merge bk-kjt before release -mm kernels adding > there (bk-kjt) only reviewed patches posted at this list. Comments? no the "release process" of kj is to go through maintainers, and letting them test and merge the patches. so taking the load of the submitters. best regards -- maks --===============81521382619628646== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Kernel-janitors mailing list Kernel-janitors@lists.osdl.org http://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel-janitors --===============81521382619628646==--