From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261662AbULNVSo (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Dec 2004 16:18:44 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261664AbULNVSo (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Dec 2004 16:18:44 -0500 Received: from mx2.elte.hu ([157.181.151.9]:56509 "EHLO mx2.elte.hu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261662AbULNVSm (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Dec 2004 16:18:42 -0500 Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 22:18:28 +0100 From: Ingo Molnar To: Steven Rostedt Cc: Lee Revell , LKML , Rui Nuno Capela , Mark Johnson , "K.R. Foley" , Bill Huey , Adam Heath , Florian Schmidt , Thomas Gleixner , Fernando Pablo Lopez-Lezcano , George Anzinger Subject: Re: [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.10-rc3-mm1-V0.7.33-0 Message-ID: <20041214211828.GA17216@elte.hu> References: <20041122005411.GA19363@elte.hu> <20041123175823.GA8803@elte.hu> <20041124101626.GA31788@elte.hu> <20041203205807.GA25578@elte.hu> <20041207132927.GA4846@elte.hu> <20041207141123.GA12025@elte.hu> <20041214132834.GA32390@elte.hu> <1103052853.3582.46.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1103054908.14699.20.camel@krustophenia.net> <1103057144.3582.51.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1103057144.3582.51.camel@localhost.localdomain> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-ELTE-SpamVersion: MailScanner 4.31.6-itk1 (ELTE 1.2) SpamAssassin 2.63 ClamAV 0.73 X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-4.9, required 5.9, autolearn=not spam, BAYES_00 -4.90 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamScore: -4 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Steven Rostedt wrote: > > > [RFC] > > > > > > Ingo, > > > > > > Any thought about adding a one shot timer for the system? > > > > > > > Isn't this what George Anzinger is working on? > > > > http://sourceforge.net/projects/high-res-timers/ > > > > Lee > > > > A quick look at this looks like this is what I was looking for. I'd > need to review the code in a more detailed aspect but first glance, > Yes, this is what I want. > > Now, since High Res-timers and RT seem to go together, what are the > plans for merging these? If this is indeed what I need, then I'll be > doing it to myself, [...] i've been thinking about it on and off. If you would/could try it that would certainly help. RT for Linux is a dance of many small steps. the two projects are obviously complementary and i have no intention to reinvent the wheel in any way. Best would be to bring hires timers up to upstream-mergable state (independently of the -RT patch) and ask Andrew to include it in -mm, then i'd port -RT to it automatically. Ingo