From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
To: Alan Cox <alan@redhat.com>, Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru>
Cc: netdev@oss.sgi.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [2.6 patch] net/netlink/af_netlink.c: possible cleanups
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2004 01:46:04 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20041215004604.GH23151@stusta.de> (raw)
The patch below contains the following possible cleanups:
- make the needlessly global function netlink_getsockbypid static
- remove the EXPORT_SYMBOL'ed but unused functions netlink_attach and
netlink_detach
Please review whether these changes are correct or whether they conflict
with pending patches.
diffstat output:
include/linux/netlink.h | 3 ---
net/netlink/af_netlink.c | 28 +---------------------------
2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 30 deletions(-)
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
--- linux-2.6.10-rc3-mm1-full/include/linux/netlink.h.old 2004-12-14 21:43:16.000000000 +0100
+++ linux-2.6.10-rc3-mm1-full/include/linux/netlink.h 2004-12-14 21:44:27.000000000 +0100
@@ -116,8 +116,6 @@
#define NETLINK_CREDS(skb) (&NETLINK_CB((skb)).creds)
-extern int netlink_attach(int unit, int (*function)(int,struct sk_buff *skb));
-extern void netlink_detach(int unit);
extern int netlink_post(int unit, struct sk_buff *skb);
extern struct sock *netlink_kernel_create(int unit, void (*input)(struct sock *sk, int len));
extern void netlink_ack(struct sk_buff *in_skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh, int err);
@@ -129,7 +127,6 @@
extern int netlink_unregister_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb);
/* finegrained unicast helpers: */
-struct sock *netlink_getsockbypid(struct sock *ssk, u32 pid);
struct sock *netlink_getsockbyfilp(struct file *filp);
int netlink_attachskb(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb, int nonblock, long timeo);
void netlink_detachskb(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb);
--- linux-2.6.10-rc3-mm1-full/net/netlink/af_netlink.c.old 2004-12-14 21:43:31.000000000 +0100
+++ linux-2.6.10-rc3-mm1-full/net/netlink/af_netlink.c 2004-12-14 21:44:34.000000000 +0100
@@ -546,7 +546,7 @@
}
}
-struct sock *netlink_getsockbypid(struct sock *ssk, u32 pid)
+static struct sock *netlink_getsockbypid(struct sock *ssk, u32 pid)
{
int protocol = ssk->sk_protocol;
struct sock *sock;
@@ -1210,30 +1210,6 @@
* Backward compatibility.
*/
-int netlink_attach(int unit, int (*function)(int, struct sk_buff *skb))
-{
- struct sock *sk = netlink_kernel_create(unit, NULL);
- if (sk == NULL)
- return -ENOBUFS;
- nlk_sk(sk)->handler = function;
- write_lock_bh(&nl_emu_lock);
- netlink_kernel[unit] = sk->sk_socket;
- write_unlock_bh(&nl_emu_lock);
- return 0;
-}
-
-void netlink_detach(int unit)
-{
- struct socket *sock;
-
- write_lock_bh(&nl_emu_lock);
- sock = netlink_kernel[unit];
- netlink_kernel[unit] = NULL;
- write_unlock_bh(&nl_emu_lock);
-
- sock_release(sock);
-}
-
int netlink_post(int unit, struct sk_buff *skb)
{
struct socket *sock;
@@ -1522,7 +1498,5 @@
EXPORT_SYMBOL(netlink_unregister_notifier);
#if defined(CONFIG_NETLINK_DEV) || defined(CONFIG_NETLINK_DEV_MODULE)
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(netlink_attach);
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(netlink_detach);
EXPORT_SYMBOL(netlink_post);
#endif
next reply other threads:[~2004-12-15 0:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-12-15 0:46 Adrian Bunk [this message]
2004-12-15 14:07 ` [2.6 patch] net/netlink/af_netlink.c: possible cleanups jamal
2004-12-28 3:08 ` David S. Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20041215004604.GH23151@stusta.de \
--to=bunk@stusta.de \
--cc=alan@redhat.com \
--cc=kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.