From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [172.16.48.31]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id iBGB19r07928 for ; Thu, 16 Dec 2004 06:01:09 -0500 Received: from Cantor.suse.de (mail-ex.suse.de [195.135.220.2]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id iBGB0whU002399 for ; Thu, 16 Dec 2004 06:01:08 -0500 Received: from hermes.suse.de (hermes-ext.suse.de [195.135.221.8]) (using TLSv1 with cipher EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA (168/168 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by Cantor.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3FB6122608F for ; Thu, 16 Dec 2004 12:00:52 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2004 12:00:52 +0100 From: Arvin Schnell Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] patch for separator option Message-ID: <20041216110052.GA4410@suse.de> References: <20041214093850.GA16922@suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20041214093850.GA16922@suse.de> Reply-To: LVM general discussion and development List-Id: LVM general discussion and development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Linux LVM On Tue, Dec 14, 2004 at 10:38:50AM +0100, Arvin Schnell wrote: > > Hi, > > I realized that the -s/--short option for vgdisplay doesn't work > in lvm 2.2.00.31 (but also older versions). That's because the > option --separator also gets the short option 's' in args.h. > > Attached is a patch. It the patch ok and will it be included in lvm2? Or am I missing something? ciao Arvin