From: Luca Ferrari <fluca1978@katamail.com>
To: linux-admin@vger.kernel.org
Subject: samba or nfs?
Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2004 12:14:39 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200412161214.40240.fluca1978@katamail.com> (raw)
Hi,
in my factory we are sharing resources (files) among different linux servers,
even located in another site (i.e., using an adsl connection). Which do you
believe is the better sharing protocol (NFS/SAMBA) to mount server resources?
Actually we are using samba, due also to the fact that the line speed was not
very high and NFS seemed to have a few problem with the speed. Now that the
speed is higher, but the line has a few moment of freeze, samba seems to be
inadequate. Any opinion?
Thanks,
Luca
--
Luca Ferrari,
fluca1978@katamail.com
next reply other threads:[~2004-12-16 11:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-12-16 11:14 Luca Ferrari [this message]
2004-12-16 12:20 ` samba or nfs? Martin Klier
2004-12-17 8:42 ` urgrue
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200412161214.40240.fluca1978@katamail.com \
--to=fluca1978@katamail.com \
--cc=linux-admin@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.