From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262205AbULRLOX (ORCPT ); Sat, 18 Dec 2004 06:14:23 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262212AbULRLOX (ORCPT ); Sat, 18 Dec 2004 06:14:23 -0500 Received: from mail-ex.suse.de ([195.135.220.2]:42931 "EHLO Cantor.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262205AbULRLOV (ORCPT ); Sat, 18 Dec 2004 06:14:21 -0500 Date: Sat, 18 Dec 2004 12:14:20 +0100 From: Andi Kleen To: Bart De Schuymer Cc: Andi Kleen , Crazy AMD K7 , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@oss.sgi.com Subject: Re: do_IRQ: stack overflow: 872.. Message-ID: <20041218111420.GE338@wotan.suse.de> References: <1131604877.20041218092730@mail.ru.suse.lists.linux.kernel> <1103368330.3566.15.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1103368330.3566.15.camel@localhost.localdomain> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > The bridge-nf code does not use recursive function calls and there is no > long consecutive function calling. Furthermore, there is no function in > the bridge-nf code that uses a large part of the stack. Just take a look at the backtrace in the original post. It clearly shows a problem. And it points strongly towards br-netfilter.