From: William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com>
To: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>,
Linux Memory Management <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/10] alternate 4-level page tables patches
Date: Sat, 18 Dec 2004 16:20:10 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20041219002010.GN771@holomorphy.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <41C4C5C2.5000607@yahoo.com.au>
William Lee Irwin III wrote:
>> vmas are unmapped one-by-one during process destruction.
On Sun, Dec 19, 2004 at 11:05:22AM +1100, Nick Piggin wrote:
> Yeah but clear_page_tables isn't called for each vma that is unmapped
> at exit time. Rather, one big one is called at the end - I suspect
> this is usually more efficient.
For clear_page_tables() you want to scan as little as possible. The
exit()-time performance issue is tlb_finish_mmu().
-- wli
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"aart@kvack.org"> aart@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-12-19 0:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 77+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-12-18 6:55 [RFC][PATCH 0/10] alternate 4-level page tables patches Nick Piggin
2004-12-18 6:55 ` [PATCH 1/10] " Nick Piggin
2004-12-18 6:56 ` [PATCH 2/10] " Nick Piggin
2004-12-18 6:56 ` [PATCH 3/10] " Nick Piggin
2004-12-18 6:57 ` [PATCH 4/10] " Nick Piggin
2004-12-18 6:58 ` [PATCH 5/10] " Nick Piggin
2004-12-18 6:58 ` [PATCH 6/10] " Nick Piggin
2004-12-18 6:59 ` [PATCH 7/10] " Nick Piggin
2004-12-18 7:00 ` [PATCH 8/10] " Nick Piggin
2004-12-18 7:00 ` [PATCH 9/10] " Nick Piggin
2004-12-18 7:01 ` [PATCH 10/10] " Nick Piggin
2004-12-18 7:31 ` Andi Kleen
2004-12-18 7:46 ` Nick Piggin
2004-12-18 8:08 ` Andrew Morton
2004-12-18 9:48 ` Andi Kleen
2004-12-18 19:06 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-12-20 17:43 ` Andi Kleen
2004-12-20 17:47 ` Randy.Dunlap
2004-12-20 18:08 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-12-20 18:15 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-12-20 18:19 ` Andi Kleen
2004-12-20 18:47 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-12-20 18:52 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-12-20 18:59 ` Andi Kleen
2004-12-20 18:57 ` Randy.Dunlap
2004-12-18 9:05 ` [PATCH 4/10] " Nick Piggin
2004-12-18 9:50 ` Andi Kleen
2004-12-18 10:06 ` Nick Piggin
2004-12-18 10:11 ` Andi Kleen
2004-12-18 10:22 ` Nick Piggin
2004-12-18 10:29 ` Nick Piggin
2004-12-18 11:06 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-12-18 11:17 ` Nick Piggin
2004-12-18 11:32 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-12-18 11:55 ` Nick Piggin
2004-12-18 12:46 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-12-18 12:48 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-12-19 0:05 ` Nick Piggin
2004-12-19 0:20 ` William Lee Irwin III [this message]
2004-12-19 0:38 ` Nick Piggin
2004-12-19 1:01 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-12-19 1:31 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-12-19 2:08 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-12-19 2:26 ` Nick Piggin
2004-12-19 5:23 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-12-19 6:02 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-12-19 18:17 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-12-20 1:00 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-12-18 10:45 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-12-18 10:58 ` Nick Piggin
2004-12-19 0:07 ` [RFC][PATCH 0/10] " Hugh Dickins
2004-12-19 0:33 ` Nick Piggin
2004-12-20 18:04 ` Andi Kleen
2004-12-20 18:40 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-12-20 18:53 ` Andi Kleen
2004-12-21 0:04 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-12-21 0:22 ` Andi Kleen
2004-12-21 0:43 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-12-21 0:47 ` Nick Piggin
2004-12-21 2:55 ` Hugh Dickins
2004-12-21 3:21 ` Nick Piggin
2004-12-21 3:47 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-12-21 3:56 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-12-21 4:04 ` Nick Piggin
2004-12-21 4:08 ` Nick Piggin
2004-12-21 9:36 ` Andi Kleen
2004-12-21 10:13 ` Hugh Dickins
2004-12-21 10:59 ` Nick Piggin
2004-12-21 17:36 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-12-21 20:19 ` Andi Kleen
2004-12-21 23:49 ` Nick Piggin
2004-12-22 10:38 ` Andi Kleen
2004-12-22 11:19 ` Nick Piggin
2004-12-22 11:23 ` Nick Piggin
2004-12-22 18:07 ` Andi Kleen
2004-12-30 21:24 ` Nick Piggin
2004-12-21 10:52 ` Nick Piggin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20041219002010.GN771@holomorphy.com \
--to=wli@holomorphy.com \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=hugh@veritas.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.