From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
To: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
Cc: Pete Zaitcev <zaitcev@redhat.com>,
linux-usb-devel@lists.sourcefoge.net.kroah.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, laforge@gnumonks.org
Subject: Re: My vision of usbmon
Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2004 21:04:24 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20041222050424.GB31076@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1103679534.5055.2.camel@npiggin-nld.site>
On Wed, Dec 22, 2004 at 12:38:54PM +1100, Nick Piggin wrote:
> On Tue, 2004-12-21 at 16:57 -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Sun, Dec 19, 2004 at 11:04:54PM -0800, Pete Zaitcev wrote:
> > > Hi, Guys:
> > >
> > > This is usbmon which I cooked up because I got tired from adding dbg()'s
> > > and polluting my dmesg. I use it to hunt bugs in USB storage devices so
> > > far, and it's useful, although limited at this stage.
> > >
> > > I looked at the Harding's USBmon patch, and I think he got a few things right.
> > > The main of them is that I underestimated the benefits of placing the special
> > > files into the filesystem namespace. When we discussed it with Greg in the
> > > airport, we decided that having some sort of Netlink-style socket would be
> > > the best option. I decided to make a u-turn and attach those sockets into
> > > the namespace (currently under /dbg, but it can change). What this buys us is:
> > >
>
> Is there any reason why these debug filesystems are going under the
> root directory? Why not /sys/debug or /sys/kernel/debug or something?
See the previous thread as to where to mount debugfs. In short, I don't
really care :)
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-12-22 5:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-12-20 7:04 My vision of usbmon Pete Zaitcev
[not found] ` <200412201255.59120.oliver@neukum.org>
2004-12-20 12:21 ` [linux-usb-devel] " Pete Zaitcev
2004-12-22 0:57 ` Greg KH
2004-12-22 1:29 ` Pete Zaitcev
2004-12-22 5:06 ` Greg KH
2004-12-22 5:10 ` Greg KH
2004-12-22 1:38 ` Nick Piggin
2004-12-22 5:04 ` Greg KH [this message]
2004-12-22 5:34 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-12-22 6:43 ` Greg KH
[not found] ` <200412201525.52149.oliver@neukum.org>
2004-12-22 2:25 ` Pete Zaitcev
2004-12-22 5:03 ` Greg KH
2004-12-22 20:46 ` Oliver Neukum
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-12-23 21:02 Chad Kitching
2005-01-11 1:36 ` Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20041222050424.GB31076@kroah.com \
--to=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=laforge@gnumonks.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb-devel@lists.sourcefoge.net.kroah.org \
--cc=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
--cc=zaitcev@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.