From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dave Feustel Subject: Re: Porting Xen Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2004 06:45:55 -0500 Message-ID: <200412220645.55461.dfeustel@mindspring.com> References: Reply-To: dfeustel@mindspring.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline Sender: xen-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: xen-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: To: xen-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Cc: Ian Pratt , Adam Sulmicki , David Hopwood List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Wednesday 22 December 2004 12:01 am, Ian Pratt wrote: > > once it has full hardware support, it won't be > > paravirtualization anymore, will be? > > Using the new hardware support Xen will have the capability to run > unmodified guests, but where possible you'll still want to use > paravirtualized guests as they'll offer better performance and benefit > from being aware of the virtualized environment. > > Ian Will Xen itself be virtualizable (ie run under Xen) with the VT technolgy? Thanks, Dave Feustel ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/