From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Mark Williams (MWP)" Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2004 16:54:08 +0000 Subject: Re: [LARTC] What is wrong here (continued...)? Message-Id: <20041223165223.GA13025@linux.comp> List-Id: References: <20041223141235.GA6831@linux.comp> In-Reply-To: <20041223141235.GA6831@linux.comp> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: lartc@vger.kernel.org > >As you can see class 25 has priority 8, so all other traffic should get > >preference, which is not happening. > >It almost seems like all the priorities are reversed... > > > > Err... I haven't checked the docs, but I think that's because the > priorities are the other way around... Nope, the HTB man page says: prio priority In the round-robin process, classes with the lowest priority field are tried for packets first. Manda- tory. I did actually try reversed priorities after i made the graph, etc though. It just made things worse... so they are in the correct order. Mark. _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/