All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Mark Williams (MWP)" <mwp@internode.on.net>
To: lartc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [LARTC] What is wrong here (continued...)?
Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2004 07:54:00 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20041224074200.GA4100@linux.comp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20041223141235.GA6831@linux.comp>

> On Thursday 23 December 2004 17:52, Mark Williams (MWP) wrote:
> > > >As you can see class 25 has priority 8, so all other traffic should get
> > > >preference, which is not happening.
> > > >It almost seems like all the priorities are reversed...
> > >
> > > Err... I haven't checked the docs, but I think that's because the
> > > priorities are the other way around...
> >
> > Nope, the HTB man page says:
> >
> >       prio priority
> >               In the round-robin process, classes with the lowest
> >               priority  field are tried for packets first. Manda-
> >               tory.
> >
> > I did actually try reversed priorities after i made the graph, etc though.
> > It just made things worse... so they are in the correct order.
>
> If you have classes with different prio's, you have to know what's going on.  
> The class with the lowest prio has the highest priority.  This means that 
> that class will get the lowes delay ONLY if this class is not sending more 
> then the configured rate.  This also means that this class will get the 
> remaining bandwidth of the parent AFTER the other child classes are served.

Ok, so priorities are ignored as soon as used bandwidth of a class goes above
the "rate" setting?

Thanks.
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

  parent reply	other threads:[~2004-12-24  7:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-12-23 14:24 [LARTC] What is wrong here (continued...)? Mark Williams (MWP)
2004-12-23 16:54 ` Mark Williams (MWP)
2004-12-23 18:30 ` Stef Coene
2004-12-24  7:54 ` Mark Williams (MWP) [this message]
2004-12-24  9:10 ` Stef Coene
2004-12-24 13:20 ` Mark Williams (MWP)

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20041224074200.GA4100@linux.comp \
    --to=mwp@internode.on.net \
    --cc=lartc@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.