From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261539AbULYRfC (ORCPT ); Sat, 25 Dec 2004 12:35:02 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261543AbULYRfB (ORCPT ); Sat, 25 Dec 2004 12:35:01 -0500 Received: from coderock.org ([193.77.147.115]:6877 "EHLO trashy.coderock.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261539AbULYRev (ORCPT ); Sat, 25 Dec 2004 12:34:51 -0500 Date: Sat, 25 Dec 2004 18:34:57 +0100 From: Domen Puncer To: lkml Subject: Re: maintainers: remove moderated arm list Message-ID: <20041225173457.GB3768@masina.coderock.org> References: <20041225170825.GA31577@nd47.coderock.org> <20041225172155.A26504@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20041225172155.A26504@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 25/12/04 17:21 +0000, Russell King wrote: > On Sat, Dec 25, 2004 at 06:08:25PM +0100, Domen Puncer wrote: > > If you are subscribed to it, you already know the address. If you are not, > > you probably don't want bounces. > > I don't particularly agree with this policy of removing such documentation, > especially as I have a good reason to implement such policy on my mailing > lists. > > If we must, I guess it's fine, but I expect *you* to provide the support > to people to people who don't know where to go for it if *you* remove this. Well... there is webpage URL. How about adding a new flag to MAINTAINERS (ie. "LM", for list-moderated)? Domen