From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Sander <sander@humilis.net>
Subject: reiser4 and apache (was: Re: Reiser4 and ZFS)
Date: Mon, 27 Dec 2004 13:28:15 +0100
Message-ID: <20041227122814.GA7388@favonius>
References: <20041215064608.66493.qmail@web50901.mail.yahoo.com> <200412152000.iBFK0CHH016500@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
Reply-To: sander@humilis.net
Mime-Version: 1.0
Return-path: <reiserfs-list-return-22908-reiserfs=m.gmane.org@namesys.com>
list-help: <mailto:reiserfs-list-help@namesys.com>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:reiserfs-list-unsubscribe@namesys.com>
list-post: <mailto:reiserfs-list@namesys.com>
Errors-To: flx@namesys.com
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <200412152000.iBFK0CHH016500@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
List-Id: <reiserfs-devel.vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Cc: reiserfs-list@namesys.com

Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu wrote (ao):
> For many shops, it's quite likely that a ZFS with "more scalability
> and administration" is The Right Choice, especially if it does *NOT*
> include lots of odd new features and quirks that might break
> production code (remember the joys in getting Apache running on
> reiser4, until it was discovered that the 'file-as-directory' stuff
> broke programs that weren't expecting it?).

I just got bitten by this. Is it possible to get apache to run on
reiser4, and if so, how?

I'm nog lazy, I just didn't search the archives yet :-)

Will do now, but if anybody knows a quick answer..