From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sander Subject: Re: Congratulations! we have got hash function screwed up Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2004 18:47:32 +0100 Message-ID: <20041230174732.GB5206@favonius> References: <77912E9FD42896419D1CEF15E1C397A58AFCF1@london.jaguarfreightservices.local> <20041230235911.4911a20c.hihone@bigpond.net.au> <87is6jpvdu.fsf@quasar.esben-stien.name> Reply-To: sander@humilis.net Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Errors-To: flx@namesys.com Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87is6jpvdu.fsf@quasar.esben-stien.name> List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Esben Stien Cc: Matthias Andree , hihone@bigpond.net.au, reiserfs-list@namesys.com Esben Stien wrote (ao): > I really don't like that there is no undelete feature in reiserfs - > it's not planned for reiserfs-4 either. I see desperate users all the > time trying to get back what they mistakenly removed. If you 'see desperate users all the time' you might be amoung the wrong people ;-) Maybe you can clue them in the wonderful world of making backups? Next time it is not their mistake, but instead a broken harddisk. Undelete wont save them then. Or they just edited it instead of rm.