From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christian Iversen Subject: Re: Congratulations! we have got hash function screwed up Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2004 18:15:09 +0100 Message-ID: <200412301815.09490.chrivers@iversen-net.dk> References: <77912E9FD42896419D1CEF15E1C397A58AFCF1@london.jaguarfreightservices.local> <87is6jpvdu.fsf@quasar.esben-stien.name> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Errors-To: flx@namesys.com In-Reply-To: <87is6jpvdu.fsf@quasar.esben-stien.name> Content-Disposition: inline List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: reiserfs-list@namesys.com On Thursday 30 December 2004 18:07, Esben Stien wrote: > Matthias Andree writes: > > All private machines I deal with are reiserfs-free as of a few hours > > ago. > > What do you use instead? > > I really don't like that there is no undelete feature in reiserfs - > it's not planned for reiserfs-4 either. I see desperate users all the > time trying to get back what they mistakenly removed. It shouldn't be > hard with reiserfs either. There should be a selection of what files > to restore, so we can avoid the file merging problem with rebuilding > the tree from leaf nodes. > > > I have seen too many bugs in reiserfs3. > > Is there a list of these current issues? > > > "Who cares, not us for the past five years" is not a proper response > > to a real-world problem. > > I also reacted to this response. > > A flaw in the filesystem, in my opinion, is equivalent to the space > ship crashing and all crew members die. To be more exact, it's equal to a mars probe stranding and making many scientists very nervous :-) -- Regards, Christian Iversen