From: Piotr Neuman <sikkh@wp.pl>
To: reiserfs-list@namesys.com
Subject: Re: Recursive modified-timestamp?
Date: Sat, 1 Jan 2005 13:28:13 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200501011328.13093.sikkh@wp.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1909372133-BeMail@cr593174-a>
Dnia sobota 01 styczeñ 2005 04:12, Alexander G. M. Smith napisa³:
> Fred Schaettgen wrote on Sat, 1 Jan 2005 01:43:48 +0100:
> > The file system itself could help for instance by providing a new
> > "change-monitor"-flag for a file. This flag would be set only from
> > userspace and reset when the file is modified. If the flag is still set
> > when the file is being modified, the filesystem would then create a
> > symlink or something like for the file in a special directory.
>
> That reminds me that the other thing BeOS had was a change notification
> system using messaging. If you requested monitoring of a directory or
> file (with flags to say which kind of changes are of interest) then
> it would send your program a BMessage with the details (such as a file
> being added to a directory).
Linux has both inotify and dnotify. I really love the kind of threads where
nobody cares to do the research into existing solutions /approaches and
everybody are talking about their ideas (which is of course easier than
searching on google).
ps. and yup the GNOME folks are busy coding for inotify instead of imagining
"something that may or may not exist". Just becose you send stuff to
technical mailing list, doesn't mean you have a clue...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-01-01 12:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-12-31 9:47 Recursive modfied-timestamp? Fred Schaettgen
2004-12-31 22:49 ` David Masover
2005-01-01 0:43 ` Recursive modified-timestamp? Fred Schaettgen
2005-01-01 3:12 ` Alexander G. M. Smith
2005-01-01 11:56 ` Fred Schaettgen
2005-01-01 12:28 ` Piotr Neuman [this message]
2005-01-01 13:20 ` Fred Schaettgen
2005-01-01 17:08 ` Piotr Neuman
2005-01-01 18:18 ` Fred Schaettgen
2005-01-01 0:51 ` Recursive modfied-timestamp? Alexander G. M. Smith
2005-01-01 21:49 ` Hans Reiser
2005-01-02 4:22 ` AMD64/Reiser4 testing and problems Isaac Chanin
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-01-01 18:59 Recursive modified-timestamp? Alexander G. M. Smith
2005-01-02 17:52 ` Hans Reiser
2005-01-06 22:31 ` David Masover
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200501011328.13093.sikkh@wp.pl \
--to=sikkh@wp.pl \
--cc=reiserfs-list@namesys.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.