From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kris Van Hees Subject: Re: AFS-based VBD backend Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2005 21:59:41 -0500 Message-ID: <20050104025941.GA25884@alchar.org> References: <20050104025418.GC11046@spirit.terraluna.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050104025418.GC11046@spirit.terraluna.org> Sender: xen-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: xen-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: To: Steve Traugott Cc: Ian Pratt , xen-devel@lists.sourceforge.net List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Mon, Jan 03, 2005 at 06:54:18PM -0800, Steve Traugott wrote: > On Thu, Dec 23, 2004 at 01:38:53PM -0000, Ian Pratt wrote: > > Interesting. Is 2.6 OpenAFS support being actively worked on? Who by? > > Not sure how mature it is, but there's been a good deal of 2.6 > experience reported on the openafs list; it appears to be working, at > least on the client side, at least for some folks. I'm guessing we'll > see it official early in OpenAFS 1.4.X. It is not likely that OpenAFS 1.4 will be released before support exists for Linux 2.6. It is currently fairly well supported in the 1.3.x series, but one major feature that is lacking on Linux 2.6 is PAG support. That is currently being worked on though. Right now, most of the active Linux OpenAFS developers are working on stabilizing the Linux 2.6 support. Kris ------------------------------------------------------- The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek. It's fun and FREE -- well, almost....http://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt