From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
To: Dmitry Torokhov <dtor_core@ameritech.net>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>,
Vojtech Pavlik <vojtech@suse.cz>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@osdl.org, vojtech@ucw.cz
Subject: Re: [bk patches] Long delayed input update
Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2005 15:50:11 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050104145011.GB3097@stusta.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200501040114.26499.dtor_core@ameritech.net>
On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 01:14:26AM -0500, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> On Tuesday 04 January 2005 12:54 am, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> >
> > I pulled and immediately unpulled again.
> >
> > Vojtech, stuff like this is unacceptable:
> >
> > PS/2 driver library (SERIO_LIBPS2) [N/m/y/?] (NEW) ?
> >
> > Say Y here if you are using a driver for device connected
> > to a PS/2 port, such as PS/2 mouse or standard AT keyboard.
> >
> > Stop messing with peoples minds. The default config should contain
> > keyboard and mouse support, and unless the user asks for "Embedded" or the
> > year 2010 comes along and you can't find computers with non-USB keyboards
> > anyway, that's how it's going to remain.
> >
> > We had this _idiocy_ early in 2.5.x, and it caused untold silly problems.
> > We fixed it. We're not going to re-do that mistake.
>
> When I do "make oldconfig" it silently sets SERIO_LIBPS2 to Y if I have
> either atkbd or psmouse built-in and if both of them are modules it gives
> option [M/y]. Do you have atkbd or psmouse selected?
>...
As far as I can see, you are correct, and unless you are on !X86 or have
EMBEDDED enabled SERIO_LIBPS2 is always forced to yes.
But although it doesn't seem to be a problem, I'm wondering why
SERIO_LIBPS2 is a user-visible option?
> Dmitry
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-01-04 14:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-12-27 14:28 [bk patches] Long delayed input update Vojtech Pavlik
2004-12-27 19:19 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2005-01-03 13:18 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2005-01-04 5:54 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-01-04 6:14 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2005-01-04 14:50 ` Adrian Bunk [this message]
2005-01-04 15:17 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2005-01-04 13:58 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2005-01-04 15:58 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-01-04 16:08 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2005-01-04 16:14 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-01-04 16:23 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2005-01-04 18:03 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-01-04 18:13 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2005-01-04 16:40 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2005-01-04 17:22 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2005-01-04 17:32 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2005-01-04 16:23 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050104145011.GB3097@stusta.de \
--to=bunk@stusta.de \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=dtor_core@ameritech.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
--cc=vojtech@suse.cz \
--cc=vojtech@ucw.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.