From: Maarten <maarten@ultratux.net>
To: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Which drive gets read in case of inconsistency? [was: ext3 journal on software raid etc]
Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2005 15:22:37 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200501041522.37374.maarten@ultratux.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7nfqa2-3qg.ln1@news.it.uc3m.es>
On Tuesday 04 January 2005 13:44, Peter T. Breuer wrote:
> Michael Tokarev <mjt@tls.msk.ru> wrote:
Hm, Peter, you did it again. At the very end of an admittedly interesting
discussion you come out with the baseless assumptions and conclusions.
Just when I was prepared to give you the benefit of the doubt...
>
> Anyway, strictly speaking, the answer to your question is "yes". It
> does not decrease the probability, and therefore it increases it. The
> question is by how much, and that is unanswerable.
You continue to amaze me. If it does not decrease, it automatically
increases ?? What happened to the "stays equal" possibility ?
Do you exclusively use ">" and "<" instead of "=" in your math too ?
Maybe the increase is zero. Oh wait, it could even be negative, right ? Just
as with probability. So it possibly has an increase of, say, -0.5 ?
(see how easy it is to confuse people ?)
Maarten
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-01-04 14:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 92+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <200501030916.j039Gqe23568@inv.it.uc3m.es>
2005-01-03 10:17 ` ext3 journal on software raid (was Re: PROBLEM: Kernel 2.6.10 crashing repeatedly and hard) Guy
2005-01-03 11:31 ` Peter T. Breuer
2005-01-03 17:34 ` Guy
2005-01-03 19:20 ` ext3 Gordon Henderson
2005-01-03 19:47 ` ext3 Morten Sylvest Olsen
2005-01-03 20:05 ` ext3 Gordon Henderson
2005-01-03 17:46 ` ext3 journal on software raid (was Re: PROBLEM: Kernel 2.6.10 crashing repeatedly and hard) maarten
2005-01-03 19:52 ` maarten
2005-01-03 20:41 ` Peter T. Breuer
2005-01-03 23:19 ` Peter T. Breuer
2005-01-03 23:46 ` Neil Brown
2005-01-04 0:28 ` Peter T. Breuer
2005-01-04 1:18 ` Alvin Oga
2005-01-04 4:29 ` Neil Brown
2005-01-04 8:43 ` Peter T. Breuer
2005-01-04 2:07 ` Neil Brown
2005-01-04 2:16 ` Ewan Grantham
2005-01-04 2:22 ` Neil Brown
2005-01-04 2:41 ` Andy Smith
2005-01-04 3:42 ` Neil Brown
2005-01-04 9:50 ` Peter T. Breuer
2005-01-04 14:15 ` David Greaves
2005-01-04 15:20 ` Peter T. Breuer
2005-01-04 16:42 ` Guy
2005-01-04 17:46 ` Peter T. Breuer
2005-01-04 9:30 ` Maarten
2005-01-04 10:18 ` Peter T. Breuer
2005-01-04 13:36 ` Maarten
2005-01-04 14:13 ` Peter T. Breuer
2005-01-04 19:22 ` maarten
2005-01-04 20:05 ` Peter T. Breuer
2005-01-04 21:38 ` Guy
2005-01-04 23:53 ` Peter T. Breuer
2005-01-05 0:58 ` Mikael Abrahamsson
2005-01-04 21:48 ` maarten
2005-01-04 23:14 ` Peter T. Breuer
2005-01-05 1:53 ` maarten
2005-01-04 9:46 ` Peter T. Breuer
2005-01-04 19:02 ` maarten
2005-01-04 19:12 ` David Greaves
2005-01-04 21:08 ` Peter T. Breuer
2005-01-04 22:02 ` Brad Campbell
2005-01-04 23:20 ` Peter T. Breuer
2005-01-05 5:44 ` Brad Campbell
2005-01-05 9:00 ` Peter T. Breuer
2005-01-05 9:14 ` Brad Campbell
2005-01-05 9:28 ` Peter T. Breuer
2005-01-05 9:43 ` Brad Campbell
2005-01-05 15:09 ` Guy
2005-01-05 15:52 ` maarten
2005-01-05 10:04 ` Andy Smith
2005-01-04 22:21 ` Neil Brown
2005-01-05 0:08 ` Peter T. Breuer
2005-01-04 22:29 ` Neil Brown
2005-01-05 0:19 ` Peter T. Breuer
2005-01-05 1:19 ` Jure Pe_ar
2005-01-05 2:29 ` Peter T. Breuer
2005-01-05 0:38 ` maarten
2005-01-04 9:40 ` Peter T. Breuer
2005-01-04 11:57 ` Which drive gets read in case of inconsistency? [was: ext3 journal on software raid etc] Michael Tokarev
2005-01-04 12:40 ` Morten Sylvest Olsen
2005-01-04 12:44 ` Peter T. Breuer
2005-01-04 14:22 ` Maarten [this message]
2005-01-04 14:56 ` Peter T. Breuer
2005-01-04 14:03 ` ext3 journal on software raid (was Re: PROBLEM: Kernel 2.6.10 crashing repeatedly and hard) David Greaves
2005-01-04 14:07 ` Peter T. Breuer
2005-01-04 14:43 ` David Greaves
2005-01-04 15:12 ` Peter T. Breuer
2005-01-04 16:54 ` David Greaves
2005-01-04 17:42 ` Peter T. Breuer
2005-01-04 19:12 ` David Greaves
2005-01-04 0:45 ` maarten
2005-01-04 10:14 ` Peter T. Breuer
2005-01-04 13:24 ` Maarten
2005-01-04 14:05 ` Peter T. Breuer
2005-01-04 15:31 ` Maarten
2005-01-04 16:21 ` Peter T. Breuer
2005-01-04 20:55 ` maarten
2005-01-04 21:11 ` Peter T. Breuer
2005-01-04 21:38 ` Peter T. Breuer
2005-01-04 23:29 ` Guy
2005-01-04 19:57 ` Mikael Abrahamsson
2005-01-04 21:05 ` maarten
2005-01-04 21:26 ` Alvin Oga
2005-01-04 21:46 ` Guy
2005-01-03 20:22 ` Peter T. Breuer
2005-01-03 23:05 ` Guy
2005-01-04 0:08 ` maarten
2005-01-04 8:57 ` I'm glad I don't live in Spain (was Re: ext3 journal on software raid) David L. Smith-Uchida
2005-01-03 21:36 ` ext3 journal on software raid (was Re: PROBLEM: Kernel 2.6.10 crashing repeatedly and hard) Guy
2005-01-04 0:15 ` maarten
2005-01-04 11:21 ` Michael Tokarev
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200501041522.37374.maarten@ultratux.net \
--to=maarten@ultratux.net \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.