From: Thomas Graf <tgraf@suug.ch>
To: jamal <hadi@cyberus.ca>
Cc: netdev@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [RFC] ematch API, u32 ematch, nbyte ematch, basic classifier
Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 12:09:17 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050105110917.GP26856@postel.suug.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1104893694.1124.37.camel@jzny.localdomain>
* jamal <1104893694.1124.37.camel@jzny.localdomain> 2005-01-04 21:54
> I think this is a debate that can be easily settled ;->
> Agreed logic will beat brute force smartness and u32 is not exactly
> for the faint hearted. And its usability is extremely poor - but lets
> maintain its power as is.
Absolutely.
> > Using what key? We have no knowledge about what the ematches want to
> > see or not.
>
> Ok, good question ;->
> Maybe you should have own some 32 bit key?
Actually the goal of basic is to be an alternative to u32
if hashing is not required because I think adding hashing
will simply result in a duplication of u32.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-01-05 11:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-01-03 12:56 [RFC] ematch API, u32 ematch, nbyte ematch, basic classifier Thomas Graf
2005-01-04 4:13 ` jamal
2005-01-04 12:03 ` Thomas Graf
2005-01-04 13:19 ` jamal
2005-01-04 13:46 ` Thomas Graf
2005-01-04 12:27 ` Thomas Graf
2005-01-04 13:22 ` jamal
2005-01-04 13:41 ` Thomas Graf
2005-01-05 2:54 ` jamal
2005-01-05 11:09 ` Thomas Graf [this message]
2005-01-04 22:36 ` Thomas Graf
2005-01-05 3:12 ` jamal
2005-01-05 11:00 ` Thomas Graf
2005-01-05 13:33 ` jamal
2005-01-05 14:45 ` Thomas Graf
2005-01-05 16:48 ` Thomas Graf
2005-01-06 14:03 ` jamal
2005-01-06 13:47 ` jamal
2005-01-06 19:41 ` Thomas Graf
2005-01-07 13:45 ` jamal
2005-01-08 14:54 ` Thomas Graf
2005-01-10 13:26 ` jamal
2005-01-10 21:17 ` Thomas Graf
2005-01-10 22:05 ` jamal
2005-01-10 23:30 ` Thomas Graf
2005-01-13 17:41 ` [RFC] meta ematch Thomas Graf
2005-01-13 18:54 ` Patrick McHardy
2005-01-13 19:20 ` Thomas Graf
2005-01-14 1:13 ` Patrick McHardy
2005-01-14 15:14 ` Thomas Graf
2005-01-16 14:58 ` jamal
2005-01-16 15:09 ` Thomas Graf
2005-01-16 15:37 ` jamal
2005-01-16 15:57 ` Thomas Graf
2005-01-16 16:19 ` jamal
2005-01-16 16:49 ` Thomas Graf
2005-01-16 16:11 ` jamal
2005-01-16 16:32 ` Thomas Graf
2005-01-16 17:18 ` jamal
2005-01-16 18:47 ` Thomas Graf
2005-01-16 16:32 ` Patrick McHardy
2005-01-16 17:24 ` jamal
2005-01-05 13:32 ` [RFC] ematch API, u32 ematch, nbyte ematch, basic classifier Florian Weimer
2005-01-05 13:45 ` jamal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050105110917.GP26856@postel.suug.ch \
--to=tgraf@suug.ch \
--cc=hadi@cyberus.ca \
--cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.