From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Graf Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 15:52:50 +0000 Subject: Re: [LARTC] [PATCH] mark in u32 Message-Id: <20050105155250.GA17836@postel.suug.ch> List-Id: References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: lartc@vger.kernel.org * Andy Furniss <41DC06D8.70301@dsl.pipex.com> 2005-01-05 15:25 > Thomas Graf wrote: > >>That looks handy :-) Do you know why fw mark doesn't work with policers > >>in 2.6 (assuming it's not just me) > > > > > >Be prepared to see it removed again in favour of the meta extended > >match. Don't rely too much on it. > > I searched a bit around meta data recently but couldn't find much - do > you have any links? http://oss.sgi.com/archives/netdev/2004-12/msg00767.html http://oss.sgi.com/archives/netdev/2005-01/msg00028.html > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=lartc&m0122532022827&w=2 Do you see the police/action stats being updated? i.e. does the matching itself work? Ingress qdisc reads from prerouting hook as well, might be a priority issue. _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/