From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Olaf Kirch Subject: lockd and pg_authenticate in 2.6.10 Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 17:46:42 +0100 Message-ID: <20050105164642.GJ26856@suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from sc8-sf-mx2-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.12] helo=sc8-sf-mx2.sourceforge.net) by sc8-sf-list2.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1CmFUY-0004LQ-By for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Wed, 05 Jan 2005 10:02:42 -0800 Received: from mail-ex.suse.de ([195.135.220.2] helo=Cantor.suse.de) by sc8-sf-mx2.sourceforge.net with esmtp (TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 4.41) id 1CmFUT-0001BO-MB for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Wed, 05 Jan 2005 10:02:42 -0800 Received: from hermes.suse.de (hermes-ext.suse.de [195.135.221.8]) (using TLSv1 with cipher EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA (168/168 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by Cantor.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1EEF12DA29A for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 19:02:33 +0100 (CET) To: nfs@lists.sourceforge.net Sender: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: Discussion of NFS under Linux development, interoperability, and testing. List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: Hi, I remember one of the reasons why pg_authenticate was introduced were the problems with lockd callbacks. But in 2.6.10 I cannot see lockd using it at all; only the NFSv4 code does. Am I missing something? Olaf -- Olaf Kirch | Things that make Monday morning interesting, #2: okir@suse.de | "We have 8,000 NFS mount points, why do we keep ---------------+ running out of privileged ports?" ------------------------------------------------------- The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek. It's fun and FREE -- well, almost....http://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt _______________________________________________ NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs