From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: aurelien@aurel32.net (Aurelien Jarno) Date: Thu, 19 May 2005 06:25:29 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] sensord: wrong error message with /proc or /sys not Message-Id: <20050105220231.GD19356@bode.aurel32.lan> List-Id: References: <20050105212346.GA19356@bode.aurel32.lan> In-Reply-To: <20050105212346.GA19356@bode.aurel32.lan> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: lm-sensors@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 10:39:49PM +0100, Jean Delvare wrote: > > BTW, on 2.6 kernels the sensors informations are in /sys and not > > /proc. The message may be changed into: > > > > Error reading /proc or /sys; modules probably not loaded > > True. I would certainly accept a patch that does this ;) Attached. -- .''`. Aurelien Jarno GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73 : :' : Debian GNU/Linux developer | Electrical Engineer `. `' aurel32@debian.org | aurelien@aurel32.net `- people.debian.org/~aurel32 | www.aurel32.net -------------- next part -------------- Index: prog/sensord/lib.c =================================RCS file: /home/cvs/lm_sensors2/prog/sensord/lib.c,v retrieving revision 1.5 diff -u -1 -b -p -r1.5 lib.c --- prog/sensord/lib.c 5 Jan 2005 21:44:57 -0000 1.5 +++ prog/sensord/lib.c 5 Jan 2005 22:10:15 -0000 @@ -82,3 +82,3 @@ loadConfig if (ret = -SENSORS_ERR_PROC) - sensorLog (LOG_ERR, "Error reading /proc; modules probably not loaded"); + sensorLog (LOG_ERR, "Error reading /proc or /sys; modules probably not loaded"); else @@ -99,3 +99,3 @@ loadConfig if (ret = -SENSORS_ERR_PROC) - sensorLog (LOG_ERR, "Error reading /proc; modules probably not loaded"); + sensorLog (LOG_ERR, "Error reading /proc or /sys; modules probably not loaded"); else