From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH] macros to detect existance of unlocked_ioctl and ioctl_compat Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 14:53:56 +0000 Message-ID: <20050106145356.GA18725@infradead.org> References: <20041215065650.GM27225@wotan.suse.de> <20041217014345.GA11926@mellanox.co.il> <20050103011113.6f6c8f44.akpm@osdl.org> <20050105144043.GB19434@mellanox.co.il> <20050105133448.59345b04.akpm@osdl.org> <20050106140636.GE25629@mellanox.co.il> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050106140636.GE25629@mellanox.co.il> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Cc: Andrew Morton , Takashi Iwai , ak@suse.de, mingo@elte.hu, rlrevell@joe-job.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, pavel@suse.cz, discuss@x86-64.org, gordon.jin@intel.com, alsa-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, greg@kroah.com, VANDROVE@vc.cvut.cz List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org On Thu, Jan 06, 2005 at 04:06:36PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > It should be, unless there's some problem. In maybe a week or so. > > To make life bearable for out-of kernel modules, the following patch > adds 2 macros so that existance of unlocked_ioctl and ioctl_compat > can be easily detected. That's not the way we're making additions. Get your code merged and there won't be any need to detect the feature.