From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dominik Brodowski Subject: Re: celeron *clutches at straws* Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 23:12:40 +0100 Message-ID: <20050106221240.GA8330@dominikbrodowski.de> References: <3bd91160501051619632315d0@mail.gmail.com> <20050106161312.GC10011@dominikbrodowski.de> <3bd9116050106091631b1282d@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3bd9116050106091631b1282d@mail.gmail.com> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: cpufreq-bounces@www.linux.org.uk Errors-To: cpufreq-bounces+glkc-cpufreq=gmane.org@www.linux.org.uk Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Matthew East Cc: cpufreq@www.linux.org.uk On Thu, Jan 06, 2005 at 05:16:34PM +0000, Matthew East wrote: > That is seriously useful thanks very much. I haven't looked in > /proc/acpi/processor before! I have found that the C2 state is > supported. > > mdke@kallisto mdke $ cat /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/power > active state: C2 > default state: C1 > bus master activity: 00000000 > states: > C1: promotion[C2] demotion[--] latency[000] > usage[07824590] *C2: promotion[--] demotion[C1] > latency[002] usage[134432919] > C3: Excellent. C3 would have been still better, though... > Most useful of all will be your information on throttling, which i > will experiment with. The last time I tried using throttling (through > some kde gui on a mandrake live disk), it made some strange whining > noises ;) Is it wholly safe? Noises make me uneasy... Search for singing or bad capacitors, throttling, and/or high-pitched noise on the acpi and lkml lists, then you'll read many good posts on this :-) Dominik