From: Mikhail Ramendik <mr@ramendik.ru>
To: alsa-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Compiling the newest code for testing?
Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 05:25:45 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200501070525.45603.mr@ramendik.ru> (raw)
Hello,
I would like to do some extensive testing of alsa on my Intel 865PE hardware
(notably the analog vs. SPDIF issues). I have done some bug reporting and
tested some fixes (thanks go to Takashi) in the past, but then fell out of
sync on kernel versions because of other kernel-related issues on my hardware
(now finally resolved).
I would like to test the latest code, in order for this testing to be most
useful.
But I really got lost in what is that newest code that I should test, and in
how I should get it to run. So I have some questions:
- Which alsa code version is in the 2.6.10 kernel release?
(include/sound/version.h says 1.0.6, but there seem to be changelog entries
and factual changes even from 2.6.10-rc3...)
- Which alsa kernel code should I run for testing? The 2.6.10-kernel version?
1.0.8rc2? CVS? 1.0.8rc2 plus some files from CVS [those related to i8x0]?
- Is it OK to compile this kernel code by merely copying the relevant
directories (sound [except for sound/oss] and include/sound) from the alsa
tree into the kernel tree? I run an RPM-based system, and would like to keep
the existing approach to kernel building (full RPM rebuild) alive; it's slow
but reliable.
- Which alsa-lib and alsa-utils code should I be running? (I know how to
compile it using RPM, I just need to understand the version).
And an i8x0-specific question: in the above-mentioned current code, should
output to hw:0,0 go only to analog, or to both analog and spdif?
--
Yours, Mikhail Ramendik
-------------------------------------------------------
The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues
Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek.
It's fun and FREE -- well, almost....http://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt
next reply other threads:[~2005-01-07 2:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-01-07 2:25 Mikhail Ramendik [this message]
2005-01-07 11:16 ` Compiling the newest code for testing? Takashi Iwai
2005-01-07 18:27 ` Mikhail Ramendik
2005-01-07 18:39 ` Takashi Iwai
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200501070525.45603.mr@ramendik.ru \
--to=mr@ramendik.ru \
--cc=alsa-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.