From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Chris Dukes Subject: Re: Congratulations! we have got hash function screwed up Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 17:28:04 +0000 Message-ID: <20050107172804.GI18173@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> References: <20041228221218.GA6412@schmorp.de> <20050106124505.GE5352@backtop.namesys.com> <20050106142706.GE519@schmorp.de> <41DD5FA9.5020800@namesys.com> <1967462673.20050106171323@tnonline.net> <20050106162619.GG18173@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <41DEC53A.40403@namesys.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Errors-To: flx@namesys.com Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <41DEC53A.40403@namesys.com> Sender: List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Hans Reiser Cc: Spam , reiserfs-list@namesys.com On Fri, Jan 07, 2005 at 09:22:02AM -0800, Hans Reiser wrote: > Chris Dukes wrote: > > > > > > >All filesystems will fail or suffer degraded performance under > >certain conditions, you need to determine what conditions are acceptable > >for your data. > > > > > > > and each generation of software reduces the extent of such conditions. > Reiser4 fixes this problem cleanly. Should reduce. I currently have the misfortune of supporting some software that seems to be of the "For every bug fixed atleast one bug with an equal level of impact is introduced" variety. -- Chris Dukes hello stacklimit my old friend, I've come to visit you again