From: Vitaly Fertman <vitaly@namesys.com>
To: hanasaki <hanasaki@hanaden.com>, Vladimir Saveliev <vs@namesys.com>
Cc: reiserfs-list@namesys.com
Subject: Re: --rebuild-tree always finds errors --check is ok
Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 23:43:08 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200501072343.08374.vitaly@namesys.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <41DAD195.1080306@hanaden.com>
On Tuesday 04 January 2005 20:25, hanasaki wrote:
> Version of reiserfsk
> ======================
> == From debian sarge
> /sbin/reiserfsck -V
> reiserfsck 3.6.19 (2003 www.namesys.com)
> == also used the version in knoppix 3.7 with similar results
>
> the output of two consecutive runs of --rebuild-tree on the same
> unmounted partition are attached. Below is the diff
rebuild-tree finds some blocks that looks like reiserfs formatted
blocks for the first sight whereas they are not and just belongs to
some file bodies. The consistency check reveals no valid metadata
in them, so they are considered as not valid reiserfs formatted blocks
and left not modified on disk. This is why the second run of rebuild-tree
finds them again and tries to do all the stuff again.
--
Thanks,
Vitaly Fertman
> diff data00-run1 data00-run0
> 14c14
> < 172168 directory entries were hashed with "r5" hash.
> ---
>
> > 172167 directory entries were hashed with "r5" hash.
>
> Vladimir Saveliev wrote:
> > Hello
> >
> > On Sun, 2005-01-02 at 00:55, hanasaki wrote:
> >>Running reiser3 on kernel 2.6.10 and 2.6.9 with Debian sarge and
> >> unstable.
> >>
> >>the --rebuild-tree always finds errors and corrects them. even when run
> >>more than once consecutively without mounting the partition in between.
> >
> > Please provide reiserfsck --rebuild-tree output.
> > What is version of your reiserfsck? (reiserfsck -V)
> >
> >>--check says all is good.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-01-07 20:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-01-01 21:55 --rebuild-tree always finds errors --check is ok hanasaki
2005-01-04 14:30 ` Vladimir Saveliev
2005-01-04 17:25 ` hanasaki
2005-01-06 12:06 ` Vladimir Saveliev
2005-01-07 20:43 ` Vitaly Fertman [this message]
2005-01-08 0:44 ` hanasaki
2005-01-10 12:50 ` Vitaly Fertman
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-12-31 5:35 hanasaki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200501072343.08374.vitaly@namesys.com \
--to=vitaly@namesys.com \
--cc=hanasaki@hanaden.com \
--cc=reiserfs-list@namesys.com \
--cc=vs@namesys.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.