On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 04:46:54PM +1100, Rusty Russell wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-01-04 at 20:30 -0800, Phil Oester wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 02:35:59PM +1100, Rusty Russell wrote:
> > > The multiport match doesn't support ranges of ports, so a new match
> > > called "mport" was written.  Now we have versioning of matches and
> > > targets, we can simply put this extension in multiport revision 1.
> > 
> > While I agree the above is a useful change, why not also add inversion
> > to multiport in the process -- as long as you're making a new revision?
> > Or should that be done in revision 2?
> 
> If you put it in before 2.6.11 is released, it can go in the current
> revision, otherwise we want a new one (where do we put the invert
> flags?).

OK, how about the below which adds inversion?

(note: didn't update manpage, but then again, wasn't updated with previous
changes)

Phil