From: tglx@linutronix.de
To: akpm@osdl.org
Cc: mingo@elte.hu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 2.6.10-mm2] Fix preemption race [1/3] (Core)
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2005 01:35:13 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050110013508.1.patchmail@tglx> (raw)
The idle-thread-preemption-fix.patch introduced a race, which is not
critical, but might give us an extra turn through the scheduler. When
interrupts are reenabled in entry.c and an interrupt occures before we
reach the add_preempt_schedule() in preempt_schedule we get rescheduled
again in the return from interrupt path.
The patch prevents this by leaving preemption disabled (set to 1) and
providing a seperate function entry_preempt_schedule().
This was done by moving the inner loop of preempt_schedule() into a
seperate function do_preempt_schedule(), which has an increment argument.
The function is called from preempt_schedule() with PREEMPT_ACTIVE and
from entry_preempt_schedule() with PREEMPT_ACTIVE-1 to fixup the already
available 1 in preempt_count.
This split adds different plausibility checks for entry code and kernel
calls and provides simpler adjusting of other platforms esp. ARM to the
new code.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
---
sched.c | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
entry.S | 3 ++-
2 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
---
Index: 2.6.10-mm1/kernel/sched.c
===================================================================
--- 2.6.10-mm1/kernel/sched.c (revision 141)
+++ 2.6.10-mm1/kernel/sched.c (working copy)
@@ -2836,22 +2836,15 @@
* off of preempt_enable. Kernel preemptions off return from interrupt
* occur there and call schedule directly.
*/
-asmlinkage void __sched preempt_schedule(void)
+static void __sched do_preempt_schedule(int incr)
{
- struct thread_info *ti = current_thread_info();
#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_BKL
struct task_struct *task = current;
int saved_lock_depth;
#endif
- /*
- * If there is a non-zero preempt_count or interrupts are disabled,
- * we do not want to preempt the current task. Just return..
- */
- if (unlikely(ti->preempt_count || irqs_disabled()))
- return;
need_resched:
- add_preempt_count(PREEMPT_ACTIVE);
+ add_preempt_count(incr);
/*
* We keep the big kernel semaphore locked, but we
* clear ->lock_depth so that schedule() doesnt
@@ -2865,15 +2858,46 @@
#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_BKL
task->lock_depth = saved_lock_depth;
#endif
- sub_preempt_count(PREEMPT_ACTIVE);
+ sub_preempt_count(incr);
/* we could miss a preemption opportunity between schedule and now */
barrier();
if (unlikely(test_thread_flag(TIF_NEED_RESCHED)))
goto need_resched;
}
+/*
+ * this is is the entry point to schedule() from in-kernel preemption
+ * off of preempt_enable. Kernel preemptions off return from interrupt
+ * occur there and call schedule directly.
+ */
+asmlinkage void __sched preempt_schedule(void)
+{
+ struct thread_info *ti = current_thread_info();
+ /*
+ * If there is a non-zero preempt_count or interrupts are disabled,
+ * we do not want to preempt the current task. Just return..
+ */
+ if (unlikely(ti->preempt_count || irqs_disabled()))
+ return;
+ do_preempt_schedule(PREEMPT_ACTIVE);
+}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(preempt_schedule);
+
+asmlinkage void __sched entry_preempt_schedule(void)
+{
+ struct thread_info *ti = current_thread_info();
+ /*
+ * If preempt_count != 1 or interrupts are disabled
+ * the calling code is broken.
+ */
+ BUG_ON((ti->preempt_count != 1 || irqs_disabled()));
+
+ do_preempt_schedule(PREEMPT_ACTIVE - 1);
+}
+
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(entry_preempt_schedule);
+
#endif /* CONFIG_PREEMPT */
int default_wake_function(wait_queue_t *curr, unsigned mode, int sync, void *key)
Index: 2.6.10-mm1/arch/i386/kernel/entry.S
===================================================================
--- 2.6.10-mm1/arch/i386/kernel/entry.S (revision 141)
+++ 2.6.10-mm1/arch/i386/kernel/entry.S (working copy)
@@ -197,8 +197,9 @@
jz restore_all
testl $IF_MASK,EFLAGS(%esp) # interrupts off (exception path) ?
jz restore_all
+ movl $1,TI_preempt_count(%ebp)
sti
- call preempt_schedule
+ call entry_preempt_schedule
cli
movl $0,TI_preempt_count(%ebp)
jmp need_resched
next reply other threads:[~2005-01-10 0:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-01-10 0:35 tglx [this message]
2005-01-10 0:53 ` [PATCH 2.6.10-mm2] Use the new preemption code [2/3] Thomas Gleixner
2005-01-10 1:06 ` Russell King
2005-01-10 1:18 ` [PATCH 2.6.10-mm2] Use the new preemption code [2/3] Resend Thomas Gleixner
2005-01-10 7:32 ` Andrew Morton
2005-01-10 10:57 ` Thomas Gleixner
2005-01-10 9:46 ` Russell King
2005-01-10 10:12 ` Thomas Gleixner
2005-01-10 11:02 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-01-10 13:46 ` Thomas Gleixner
2005-01-10 1:00 ` [PATCH 2.6.10-mm2] Use the new preemption code [3/3] Thomas Gleixner
2005-01-10 14:56 ` Tom Rini
2005-01-10 15:49 ` tglx
2005-01-10 9:15 ` [PATCH 2.6.10-mm2] Fix preemption race [1/3] (Core) Ingo Molnar
2005-01-10 10:14 ` Thomas Gleixner
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-01-10 0:34 tglx
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050110013508.1.patchmail@tglx \
--to=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.