From: simms <thefirstofthechildren@yahoo.ca>
To: lartc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [LARTC] wondershaper with ssh on a non-standard port
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2005 19:49:05 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050110194905.GM13970@queeg> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1434 bytes --]
greetings all,
i've searched high and low for this, but can't seem to find an answer
anywhere..
having read the docs and the wondershaper script itself, it occurred to
me that the documentation promises an immediate drop in interactive app
latency, specifically mentioning SSH as a big winner.
however, looking through the script i can't really tell just *how*
wondershaper figures out which port my SSH daemon is running on.
so what i'd like to know is, if i'm running my sshd on, say, port 222,
do i need to make any changes to the wondershaper script, or will it
figure out the right number automagically (e.g. from /etc/services,
where SSH is already correctly assigned to port 222) ?
(conversely, does it 'need' to figure out this port number at all?)
i ask because while ping time latency has indeed fallen for me since
wondershaper was installed, my custom-port SSH connections are as slow
as ever, especially during large file uploads..
my setup in a nutshell:
- current Debian GNU/Linux 'testing' distribution ('sarge', updated daily)
- kernel 2.4.27 (Debian 'testing' default, not customized)
- wondershaper (v. 1.1a) (from current Debian 'testing')
- Shorewall (v. 2.0.13) also from 'testing'
- 4 Mbit ADSL link via 'modem' on eth0
thank you in advance!
-p
--
If economists were doctors, they would today be mired in malpractice suits.
- John Ralston Saul
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 219 bytes --]
next reply other threads:[~2005-01-10 19:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-01-10 19:49 simms [this message]
2005-01-10 22:16 ` [LARTC] wondershaper with ssh on a non-standard port Ed Wildgoose
2005-01-11 14:42 ` simms
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050110194905.GM13970@queeg \
--to=thefirstofthechildren@yahoo.ca \
--cc=lartc@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.