From: Ryan Anderson <ryan@michonline.com>
To: Jon Smirl <jonsmirl@gmail.com>
Cc: lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
kai@germaschewski.name, sam@ravnborg.org
Subject: Re: kernel versions on Linus bk tree
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2005 18:55:25 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050110235525.GG3748@mythryan2.michonline.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9e473391050108102355c9a714@mail.gmail.com>
On Sat, Jan 08, 2005 at 01:23:20PM -0500, Jon Smirl wrote:
> One solution would be to bump the version in Linus bk to 2.6.11-rc1 on
> the first check in after 2.6.10 is cut. The general case of this would
> be to always bump the Linus bk version number immediately after
> cutting the released version.
>
> I've been bitten by this ambiguity before when kernels from Linus BK
> have more code in them than the one from kernel.org and have the same
> version number. Changing the timing of the version bump would lessen
> this problem since kernels complied from Linus bk tend to have a short
> life.
I've got a patch in my local tree that tries to solve this through an
attempt to auto-append -bkXXXXXXXX (where each X is hex-digit of the md5
hash of the top-of-tree BK commit).
It doesn't solve the particular problem that caused you to send this
mail, but I think it solves the "modules from a -BK tree overwrite official releases"
problem that prompted me to code up this patch.
(Sam, Kai, I added you in case you have the time to look at this and
apply it or provide some feedback on my approach. I have both a shell
script that depends on md5sum, and a Perl script in the patch.)
Signed-Off-By: Ryan Anderson <ryan@michonline.com>
diff -Nru a/Makefile b/Makefile
--- a/Makefile 2004-10-27 04:33:05 -04:00
+++ b/Makefile 2004-10-27 04:33:05 -04:00
@@ -513,6 +513,24 @@
#export INSTALL_PATH=/boot
+# If CONFIG_LOCALVERSION_AUTO is set, we automatically perform some tests
+# and try to determine if the current source tree is a release tree, of any sort,
+# or if is a pure development tree.
+# A 'release tree' is any tree with a BitKeeper TAG associated with it.
+# The primary goal of this is to make it safe for a native BitKeeper user to
+# build a release tree (i.e, 2.6.9) and also to continue developing against the
+# current Linus tree, without having the Linus tree overwrite the 2.6.9 tree
+# when installed.
+#
+# (In the future, CVS and SVN support will be added as well.)
+
+ifeq ($(CONFIG_LOCALVERSION_AUTO),y)
+ ifeq ($(shell ls -d $(srctree)/BitKeeper 2>/dev/null),$(srctree)/BitKeeper)
+ localversion-bk := $(shell $(srctree)/scripts/setlocalversion.sh $(srctree) $(objtree))
+ LOCALVERSION := $(LOCALVERSION)$(localversion-bk)
+ endif
+endif
+
#
# INSTALL_MOD_PATH specifies a prefix to MODLIB for module directory
# relocations required by build roots. This is not defined in the
diff -Nru a/init/Kconfig b/init/Kconfig
--- a/init/Kconfig 2004-10-27 04:33:05 -04:00
+++ b/init/Kconfig 2004-10-27 04:33:05 -04:00
@@ -69,6 +69,18 @@
object and source tree, in that order. Your total string can
be a maximum of 64 characters.
+config LOCALVERSION_AUTO
+ bool "Automatically append version information to the version string"
+ default y
+ help
+ This will try to automatically determine if the current tree is a
+ release tree by looking for BitKeeper tags that belong to the
+ current top of tree revision.
+ A string of the format -BKxxxxxxxx will be added to the
+ localversion. The string generated by this will be appended
+ after any matching localversion* files, but before the
+ value set in CONFIG_LOCALVERSION
+
config SWAP
bool "Support for paging of anonymous memory (swap)"
depends on MMU
diff -Nru a/scripts/setlocalversion b/scripts/setlocalversion
--- /dev/null Wed Dec 31 16:00:00 196900
+++ b/scripts/setlocalversion 2004-10-27 04:33:05 -04:00
@@ -0,0 +1,62 @@
+#!/usr/bin/perl
+# Copyright 2004 - Ryan Anderson <ryan@michonline.com> GPL v2
+
+use strict;
+use warnings;
+use Digest::MD5;
+require 5.006;
+
+if (@ARGV != 2) {
+ print <<EOT;
+Usage: setlocalversion <srctree> <objtree>
+EOT
+ exit(1);
+}
+
+my $debug = 0;
+
+my ($srctree,$objtree) = @ARGV;
+
+my @LOCALVERSIONS = ();
+
+# BitKeeper Version Checks
+
+# We are going to use the following commands to try and determine if
+# this repository is at a Version boundary (i.e, 2.6.10 vs 2.6.10 + some patches)
+# We currently assume that all meaningful version boundaries are marked by a tag.
+# We don't care what the tag is, just that something exists.
+
+#ryan@mythryan2 ~/dev/linux/local$ T=`bk changes -r+ -k`
+#ryan@mythryan2 ~/dev/linux/local$ bk prs -h -d':TAG:\n' -r$T
+
+sub do_bk_checks {
+ chdir($srctree);
+ my $changeset = `bk changes -r+ -k`;
+ chomp $changeset;
+ my $tag = `bk prs -h -d':TAG:' -r'$changeset'`;
+
+ printf("ChangeSet Key = '%s'\nTAG = '%s'\n", $changeset, $tag) if ($debug > 0);
+
+ if (length($tag) == 0) {
+ # We do not have a tag at the Top of Tree, so we need to generate a localversion file
+ # We'll use the given $changeset as input into this.
+ my $localversion = Digest::MD5::md5_hex($changeset);
+ $localversion = substr($localversion,0,8);
+
+ printf("localversion = '%s'\n",$localversion) if ($debug > 0);
+
+ push @LOCALVERSIONS, "BK" . $localversion;
+
+ }
+}
+
+
+if ( -d "BitKeeper" ) {
+ my $bk = `which bk`;
+ chomp $bk;
+ if (length($bk) != 0) {
+ do_bk_checks();
+ }
+}
+
+printf "-%s\n", join("-",@LOCALVERSIONS) if (scalar @LOCALVERSIONS > 0);
diff -Nru a/scripts/setlocalversion.sh b/scripts/setlocalversion.sh
--- /dev/null Wed Dec 31 16:00:00 196900
+++ b/scripts/setlocalversion.sh 2004-10-27 04:33:05 -04:00
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+#!/bin/sh
+
+BK=`which bk`
+
+srctree=$1
+objtree=$2
+
+if [ "$BK" == "" ];
+then
+ echo "scripts/setlocalversion.sh: Failed to find BK, not appending a -BK* version" >&2
+ exit 0
+fi
+
+cd $srctree
+changeset=`$BK changes -r+ -k`
+tag=`$BK prs -h -d':TAG:' -r'$changeset'`
+if [ "$tag" == "" ]; then
+ echo -n $changeset | md5sum | awk '{printf "-BK%s",substr($1,1,8)}'
+fi
--
Ryan Anderson
sometimes Pug Majere
prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-01-11 0:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-01-08 18:23 kernel versions on Linus bk tree Jon Smirl
2005-01-08 18:54 ` Vincent Hanquez
2005-01-08 19:00 ` Vincent Hanquez
2005-01-09 3:44 ` Horst von Brand
2005-01-10 22:26 ` Pavel Machek
2005-01-10 23:55 ` Ryan Anderson [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050110235525.GG3748@mythryan2.michonline.com \
--to=ryan@michonline.com \
--cc=jonsmirl@gmail.com \
--cc=kai@germaschewski.name \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sam@ravnborg.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.