From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>
Cc: SCSI Mailing List <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add attribute container to the generic device model
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2005 23:08:02 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050112070802.GB2085@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1105506370.10378.26.camel@mulgrave>
On Tue, Jan 11, 2005 at 11:06:10PM -0600, James Bottomley wrote:
> Attribute containers allows a single device to belong to an arbitrary
> number of classes, each with an arbitrary number of attributes.
But classes could always have an arbitrary number of attributes, right?
> This will be used as the basis for a generic transport class, but I did
> it like this in case anyone found the abstraction useful.
Hm, I like the idea, but we already allow devices belonging to arbitrary
number of classes (through class_device) today. What makes this
different?
And how does this change, if at all, sysfs representations of devices
that use this?
Some minor comments about the code:
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(attribute_container_classdev_to_container);
Can these all be EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL? It's your choice, as you wrote the
code, but we're trying to keep the driver model stuff all GPL explicit,
as there's no way someone can say it's a "derived work" from long ago
that's using these new functions.
> +/**
> + * attribute_container_add_device - see if any container is interested in dev
> + *
> + * @dev: device to add attributes to
> + * @fn: function to trigger addition of class device.
> + *
> + * If no fn is provided, the code will simply register the class
> + * device via class_device_add.
You mean the class_device of the "container", right?
The code looks sane, if not a bit confusing as there's no user of it :)
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-01-12 7:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-01-12 5:06 [PATCH] Add attribute container to the generic device model James Bottomley
2005-01-12 7:08 ` Greg KH [this message]
2005-01-12 15:17 ` James Bottomley
2005-01-12 20:17 ` James Bottomley
2005-01-12 23:19 ` Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050112070802.GB2085@kroah.com \
--to=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.