From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Joe Buck <Joe.Buck@synopsys.COM>
Subject: Re: Incorrect warning message?
Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2005 08:48:59 -0800
Message-ID: <20050117084859.A1627@synopsys.com>
References: <20050116020836.A2421@natasha.ward.six> <jesm52pcuf.fsf@sykes.suse.de> <20050116033242.B3181@natasha.ward.six>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Return-path: <linux-gcc-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20050116033242.B3181@natasha.ward.six>; from zzz@anda.ru on Sun, Jan 16, 2005 at 03:32:42AM +0500
Sender: linux-gcc-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: <linux-gcc.vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de>, gcc@gcc.gnu.org, linux-gcc@vger.kernel.org

On Sun, Jan 16, 2005 at 03:32:42AM +0500, Denis Zaitsev wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 15, 2005 at 11:05:44PM +0100, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> > Read question 11.10 of the C faq.
> > 
> > http://www.eskimo.com/~scs/C-faq/q11.10.html
> 
> Thanks.  It's interesting.  :)

That FAQ answer is poor.  You can find the real reason in the answer
to question 1 in

http://www.jamesd.demon.co.uk/csc/faq.html#PartC

(this is for C++ but the reasoning applies to C as well).