From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alexander Clouter Subject: Re: ondemand improvements, new 'conservative' governor Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2005 09:55:17 +0000 Message-ID: <20050117095517.GA4106@inskipp> References: <20050116225136.GA28981@dominikbrodowski.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0725886699==" Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20050116225136.GA28981@dominikbrodowski.de> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: cpufreq-bounces@lists.linux.org.uk Errors-To: cpufreq-bounces+glkc-cpufreq=gmane.org@lists.linux.org.uk To: Dominik Brodowski Cc: cpufreq@lists.linux.org.uk --===============0725886699== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="+HP7ph2BbKc20aGI" Content-Disposition: inline --+HP7ph2BbKc20aGI Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Dominik, On Jan 16, Dominik Brodowski wrote: > Hi Alex, Venki, >=20 > IIRC you (Alex) wrote a few improvements to the ondemand governor -- and > IIRC they aren't all merged yet, as a few issues were still left? Also, > what's the status of your 'conservative' governor. Also IIRC it was missi= ng > some improvements made to the ondeamnd governor in the meantime. >=20 There were some improvements that I had finished porting over however then= =20 for some reason it just stopped working. Although the module worked and di= d=20 not kill the machine, regardless of the load it never increased the cpufreq= =2E=20 :( I was going to fix it once I had put back in some debugging information=20 (probably that 'evil' hack I tried to disguise as debugging which you all s= aw=20 through :) Also I thought of a nicer way to actually store the 'desired'= =20 cpufreq without making it global which I was going to add. I am free this weekend, girlfriend is away so I do not have to keep her=20 entertained which means some quality geek time. I would of done it earlier but as interest never seemed to go beyond a few friends of mine and one or two people on the mailing list I did not have people poking me into action; however I guess that happens with every patch. I'll speak to you later this week, I would do it midweek but I'm looking fo= r=20 a new flat Cheers Alex > Thanks, > Dominik --=20 _________________________________________=20 / What you don't know won't help you much \ | either. | | | \ -- D. Bennett / -----------------------------------------=20 \ ^__^ \ (oo)\_______ (__)\ )\/\ ||----w | || || --+HP7ph2BbKc20aGI Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFB64uFNv5Ugh/sRBYRAszeAJ9FDyd0bXAyDrfeFPyCV0ClcQMDkgCcDqE5 GoRjNU2lubJZ6oxVmWJpj+4= =BY1s -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --+HP7ph2BbKc20aGI-- --===============0725886699== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Cpufreq mailing list Cpufreq@lists.linux.org.uk http://www.linux.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/cpufreq --===============0725886699==--