From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261209AbVARLq0 (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Jan 2005 06:46:26 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261260AbVARLq0 (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Jan 2005 06:46:26 -0500 Received: from relay.muni.cz ([147.251.4.35]:20458 "EHLO tirith.ics.muni.cz") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261209AbVARLqZ (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Jan 2005 06:46:25 -0500 Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2005 12:45:30 +0100 From: Jan Kasprzak To: Christoph Hellwig , Jakob Oestergaard , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kruty@fi.muni.cz Subject: Re: XFS: inode with st_mode == 0 Message-ID: <20050118114530.GC27995@fi.muni.cz> References: <20041209125918.GO9994@fi.muni.cz> <20041209135322.GK347@unthought.net> <20041209215414.GA21503@infradead.org> <20041221184304.GF16913@fi.muni.cz> <20041222084158.GG347@unthought.net> <20041222182344.GB14586@infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20041222182344.GB14586@infradead.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Muni-Envelope-From: kas@fi.muni.cz X-Muni-Virus-Test: Clean Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Christoph Hellwig wrote: : I have a better patch than the one I gave you (attached below). If you : send me a mail with steps to reproduce your remaining problems I'll put : this very high on my TODO list after christmas. Btw, any chance you could : try XFS CVS (which is at 2.6.9) + the patch below instead of plain 2.6.9, : there have been various other fixes in the last months. : Just FWIW, this patch (applied to 2.6.10) seems to fix the problem for me. I was not able to reproduce it by running my test script for ~24 hours. Thanks! -Yenya -- | Jan "Yenya" Kasprzak | | GPG: ID 1024/D3498839 Fingerprint 0D99A7FB206605D7 8B35FCDE05B18A5E | | http://www.fi.muni.cz/~kas/ Czech Linux Homepage: http://www.linux.cz/ | > Whatever the Java applications and desktop dances may lead to, Unix will < > still be pushing the packets around for a quite a while. --Rob Pike <